Am I Being Too Sensitive?

[selena]

I'm with you, Sir Moby.

Take out the crib and stroller and any other inference that children are present.

Then it would be all good.

Hell, I've dated more than one guy who thought it would be all that for me to flounce around in a plaid skirt. And for at least one of them I've done it.

That isn't the issue for me. It's the suggestion of children being there while sex is taking place. That pushes it past the bounds of anything I would want to deal with.

That plus the graphic. That would have to go too.

As UW said, this could have been a cool concept, but it was ill-conceived, imho.

[Mishi]

Originally posted by SirMoby
My highschool experience was bit different. The Catholic School girls were always easy panty drops once you got them alone. The cheerleaders usually moved really well.

My reality was always the girls that dressed slutty were often just a tease but the plaid skirts meant an easy lay.

Well, you're a smooth operator that way. You probably didn't really bother with the slutty chicks, prefering more of a challenge.

Actually, I have no idea. I went to a magnet school that catered to wannabe artists and geeky loners who were willing to (*gasp*) be bussed into a predominantly black neighborhood. Our cheerleaders were kick-ass dancers (we're talking future Solid Gold) who may or may not have been sluts, but you would have called one that to her face in peril of your life. Several of my friends were strippers (fake IDs, we though nothing of it - how times change...) and they were the last ones you'd expect to be getting nekkid for money. Hmm, yes, one was a fairly devout Catholic. Also very shy - she didn't make a lot of money. In fact I don't think she ever even made it onstage...ah, memories.

Oops, I'm dragging this way off topic. Sorry!

[Mishi]

Originally posted by Cleo
I've always thought of Catholic schools as where they breed lesbians.

Well, somebody's got to do it.

[stablehand]

I understand how this might have offended you, recently becoming a father and having a baby at home. My daughter's 14, and what you're experiencing, i'd say is part of fatherhood.

For what it's worth, if any; and everyone prolly knows this, but those scenes are all from ONE video. Babysitter #6 from 2001 (A.S. was 19 1/2). That video and the series, they're up to #19 now, are sold EVERYWHERE. The graphics on the site is, as was said before, attempting to create a setting for the content. In that regard, the cover of the video is much "worse". Not defending the site that's selling viewing rights of the clips, guess I'm just missing the point what that site has anything to do with anything that's relevant to the topic of the thin line between fantasy and reality when it comes to KP.

I knew right away what video you were talking about, and having a model looking like A.S. (back then), it would have been bad business not to put her in plaid skirt, pigtails and a lollipop.

BTW, this thread is #7 for "babysitter+aurora+snow", her official site being #1. - pretty cool

[LB]

If its legal its legal ... if not then dont list it. Your sites your traffic, so your choice.

Most porn is a fantasy, and choosing which fantasy you will allow and which you wont is your choice as mostly link list owners. I dont like gay porn, I dont like mature porn or even bondage, and I find tranny porn and preggo porn repulsive, but its legal so I have no right to try and force my opinions on others and 'call them out' for having such sites.

[Kath]

Originally posted by Cleo
I've always thought of Catholic schools as where they breed lesbians.

I attended Catholic high school for freshman year only (got kicked out - no need to go into details - lol), but in the freshman class - this is 9th grade folks - we had 5 pregnant girls. The graduating class that year (12th grade) had over a dozen girls walk down the aisle to graduate that were way out pregnant. Back at the public school that I returned to the next year, there were three girls in the whole school that were pregnant over the course of the school year. BIG difference.

Anyway - I have to agree with everyone here - you are NOT over-reacting... everyone has to draw a line somewhere. THIS is your line. I think that's what I always liked best about the LL owner mentality - my list, my rules! lol List what you want and delete what you don't.

IMHO there are MUCH better ways that they could have marketed a babysitter-fantasy type niche. This is crossing MANY lines for me as well.

[caringneo]

Originally posted by LB
If its legal its legal ... if not then dont list it. Your sites your traffic, so your choice.

Most porn is a fantasy, and choosing which fantasy you will allow and which you wont is your choice as mostly link list owners. I dont like gay porn, I dont like mature porn or even bondage, and I find tranny porn and preggo porn repulsive, but its legal so I have no right to try and force my opinions on others and 'call them out' for having such sites.

I agree with LB 100%. GG mentioned that the model is well over the age. I am not sure showing crib is illegal or not. But if it is legal then, there is nothing in wrong in promoting it.
There are few big sponsors who got farm porn sites which implies beast, but actually no such content inside. This falls in the same category I feel.

But then it is your site and your traffic. You have the full freedome to decide which one to list. Like some Lnk Lists won't list gay sites.
Neo

[stev0]

Oh man... an animated baby bottle and a crib don't belong on a porn site.

But on the other hand I don't mind the whole babysitter thing, it's no different than promoting school girl uniform type sites. But you have to make it clear that the models are 18+.

The whole "daddy's got a secret" with rubber ducky's and baby bottles all over the place is a bit over the top IMO.