Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2005-01-25, 10:26 AM   #1
caringneo
Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool
 
caringneo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: PLANET EARTH
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenguy
You know, this does bring up a question - can you legally charge for access to other peoples sites/galleries?

If I had a program that had hosted galleries & free sites & someone was charging people to look at them, I think I might have to call my lawyer.
GG is right.
The submitter provides content, hosting, banwidth, and his time and work expecting traffic from linklist/TGP. Making money out of that for free is not a good idea.
Neo
__________________
Anal
Gays
caringneo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-01-25, 10:51 AM   #2
spookyx
Kodak Ghosts Run Amok
 
spookyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hobbs End
Posts: 1,718
One of the problems I see is the Visa thing. They might not like the idea of all the freesites/galleries not being on "your" domain.


spookyx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-01-25, 10:52 AM   #3
swedguy
Vagabond
 
swedguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,374
Send a message via ICQ to swedguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by caringneo
GG is right.
The submitter provides content, hosting, banwidth, and his time and work expecting traffic from linklist/TGP. Making money out of that for free is not a good idea.
Neo
For free?

There's a lot of work behind a LL. The charge would be for reviewing and providing links to the best porn out there and some other goodies. A submitter is never forced to submit to a LL/TGP. They can either submit to LL A and get 5000 mixed hits, or submit to LL B and get less traffic, but pre-approved. I know that I would take both

But the legal issue is interesting. It's the submitter that hosts the content, and he's not charging anything. It's the LL webmaster that only has a link to the free site that is charging. Common sense says that it's all good, since the person that is using the content doesn't charge anything.
swedguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-01-25, 10:53 AM   #4
PayAsYouClick
WHO IS FONZY!?! Don't they teach you anything at school?
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Send a message via ICQ to PayAsYouClick
Quote:
Originally Posted by caringneo
GG is right.
The submitter provides content, hosting, banwidth, and his time and work expecting traffic from linklist/TGP. Making money out of that for free is not a good idea.
Neo

Absolutely. That's why it is such a good idea. The sponsor gets adult-filtered traffic that's ready to make payments with one click.

Nobody's suggesting the TGPs should make money at the sponsors' expense - whether you charge for the links individually or by getting the surfer to buy a subscription to the TGP. That would be an unsustainable business model, and I think we've had enough of those already!

PayAsYouClick can also be used to (for example) charge the surfer 20c (say) for 24 hours to reach your archive / premium links page, ie a short-duration subscription to a particular part of your TGP.

Last edited by PayAsYouClick; 2005-01-25 at 10:56 AM..
PayAsYouClick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc