|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
I can't help but think a lot of this is directed at me
![]() http://web.archive.org/web/200004180...uy/removed.htm The rule has been in place for almost FIVE years. Update the site within 6 months or it gets removed. Don't like that rule, don't submit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Pay No Attention To Me, I Am Insane
|
Quote:
I read it to be sites dropping listings of a certain age so that the ones that are fresh submitted get more traffic and give the illusion the site is more 'worthy' to submit to and privide that recip. And sites just dropping listings over a certain age withour regard to any other factors other than a date in the past. Doing that across the board is bullshit if for no other reason than what I had stated, that they get to leach traffic through no fault of anyone.
__________________
Order Traffic Here SE Cloaker That I KNOW Works Multi IP, PR Hardlinks From $35/mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pay No Attention To Me, I Am Insane
|
God damn.
I went to GG to see what's listed and how I compare.. The first link I clicked on made me have to shut down my computer, LOL. I guess my clean sites will be OK then ![]()
__________________
Order Traffic Here SE Cloaker That I KNOW Works Multi IP, PR Hardlinks From $35/mo |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
I Didn't Do It
|
Quote:
I recall a thread when you talked about it with Tommy, and then started doing it.. and I was critical at the time.. When Jay posted he was doing it.. I explained why I thought it was bad too. BUT in both those cases (and Tommy) there is some justification for it in terms of link management and a belief your bookmark surfers will stay more loyal if they dont keep running across the same sites in your list. BUT I still think you guys are gaining advantage at all regular LinkLists expense... and are definitely hurting the linklist biz as a whole by doing it. I am firmly behind the notion that I will run my own site exactly how I like.. and so can anyone else, so this isn't meant to say anyone is bad or not... just that in reality submitters thinking a LinkList is better or worse based purely on traffic numbers is generally wrong.... and that the more linklists there are that decide to drop good sites after 6 months.. the less "power" our system has overall.. I believe most of us are only successful, and stayed unbeatable in the engines becasue of the power we gave each other.. the more LinkLists that have a mindset that they dont want to link to "useless" freesites.. so I'll drop them and who cares what anyone else does.. the faster we all will dissapear.. in fact I think It's already happening. Surfn's post also perfectly illustrates the problem for me as a linklist operator. If I take a site with my recip on a page with Link-O-Rama and Jays and Tommy's... in 6 months time I am Going To Be Penalised for the dangling link left on my site! Does anyone else that does it want to put forward some positive reason for doing it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Wheither you think you can or you think you can't, Your right.
|
Long as they stay valid, I dont take them down.
ronnie |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|