Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2005-03-28, 11:07 AM   #10
airdick
Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 114
Has anyone in analyzed their logs to check the % of non-referrer image requests to fuskered objects vs. non-fuskered images?

I suppose that if I see a real impact from fusker I could use the same software I use for protecting my wmv files to insure that only surfers that have hit some html on the my domain in the last X minutes can get at my images, but I haven't tried it yet for fear of causing problems for surfers, reviewers and tgp scripts that might be using multiple proxies. Are any gallery/freesite builders using the antithotlinking.com product to protect images as well as movies?

Regarding paysites that don't mind fusker traffic: I suspect that if sites can make money giving away watermarked images on Usenet that they can also make some money from watermarked images on fusker, although unlike Usenet the paysite would end up footing the bill for the bandwidth.
airdick is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc