2257 regs published in full

Barron · 2005-05-30, 01:22 PM

I should have phrased that better.

I agree, from a webmastering stand point, putting a statement on each free site or tgp is overkill.

I agree that one statement at the root of the domain is enough, or as they say, a link that opens a new window.

The link on the entry point would be to the statement.

I agree that the root of the domain is the entry point. I have no control over what urls the SE's list, they are not entry points.

I agree that the DOJ are smart enough to go to the root of the domain to find the statement.

I can see how my post might cause everyone to think that I'm saying there should be a statement for each free site or tgp. The link on the entry point would be to the statement at the root of the domain.

I agree that they could ask for all sorts or things. But, I'm thinking the simple request to see search warrant, for anything non-2257, would deter there requests. But then again, that would, EDIT: would not, stop them from coming back with one.

"At the place of business", I'm thinking I should setup the computer out in a shed, or maybe the garage, on the front porch? It gets damn cold in Minnesota.

What I disagreed with is that there is no need for a link to the statement on free sites and tgps. Hopefully I am completely wrong. But until a lawyer, an investigator or the courts tell me different, I'm will put the link on there.

_

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-05-30, 01:22 PM	#11
Barron You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try' Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 166	I should have phrased that better. I agree, from a webmastering stand point, putting a statement on each free site or tgp is overkill. I agree that one statement at the root of the domain is enough, or as they say, a link that opens a new window. The link on the entry point would be to the statement. I agree that the root of the domain is the entry point. I have no control over what urls the SE's list, they are not entry points. I agree that the DOJ are smart enough to go to the root of the domain to find the statement. I can see how my post might cause everyone to think that I'm saying there should be a statement for each free site or tgp. The link on the entry point would be to the statement at the root of the domain. I agree that they could ask for all sorts or things. But, I'm thinking the simple request to see search warrant, for anything non-2257, would deter there requests. But then again, that would, EDIT: would not, stop them from coming back with one. "At the place of business", I'm thinking I should setup the computer out in a shed, or maybe the garage, on the front porch? It gets damn cold in Minnesota. What I disagreed with is that there is no need for a link to the statement on free sites and tgps. Hopefully I am completely wrong. But until a lawyer, an investigator or the courts tell me different, I'm will put the link on there. _