My latest creation. FS

Boogie · 2005-06-03, 09:45 PM

CCBILL webmaster links are twice as redudant, in that the cookie that refers a surfer also refers a webmaster/affiliate as far as i know.

so if i saw the site and i wanted to try the sponsor i'd just click on an ad/banner

Toby · 2005-06-03, 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Boogie

CCBILL webmaster links are twice as redudant, in that the cookie that refers a surfer also refers a webmaster/affiliate as far as i know.

so if i saw the site and i wanted to try the sponsor i'd just click on an ad/banner

Yes, but quite often I find that there is no link to the webmaster info on leak free tours. I've noticed a marked increase in webmaster referals since I began including a $$WEBMASTER$$ link at the bottom of my TGP galleries for sponsors that pay for referals.

Useless · 2005-06-03, 11:41 PM

Hey - she's hot! Not that I look at that kind of thing.

The actual size of the pic in pixels is often determined by how well it can be optimized. If you shoot for between 30-50k at 700px but it looks like shit, try 650px on the long side. But don't force pics down to a kb target if they simply don't optimize well. It's give & take on both aspects. When I build, I tend to aim for between 640-700 on the long side. If the pics still linger at 80kb at 640, I'll drop to 600 and call it a day.

2005-06-03, 09:45 PM	#1
Boogie I like to blog :) Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 1,050	CCBILL webmaster links are twice as redudant, in that the cookie that refers a surfer also refers a webmaster/affiliate as far as i know. so if i saw the site and i wanted to try the sponsor i'd just click on an ad/banner __________________ I got a porn blog! Got a blog worth linking to? Contact me

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-06-03, 11:41 PM	#3
Useless Certified Nice Person Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Dirty Undies, NY Posts: 11,268	Hey - she's hot! Not that I look at that kind of thing. The actual size of the pic in pixels is often determined by how well it can be optimized. If you shoot for between 30-50k at 700px but it looks like shit, try 650px on the long side. But don't force pics down to a kb target if they simply don't optimize well. It's give & take on both aspects. When I build, I tend to aim for between 640-700 on the long side. If the pics still linger at 80kb at 640, I'll drop to 600 and call it a day.