|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: Heavy 2257 enforcement or .xxx -- which would you rather deal with? | |||
2257 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 35.14% |
.xxx |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 64.86% |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#12 |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
It sepends really. If they give .com owners the ability to get the .xxx version then I don't mind .xxx so much. On the other hand .xxx could just be a way for squatters with an inside track to gain access to millions of adult domains.
If people don't want to see porn then I don't want them on my sites. I'm happy to keep it away from them. Many of them have serious perversions and find it too tempting to stay in a hotel room alone where they can get access to softcore simulated sex movies. I want it our of my emails, I don't want it in pop ups and I certainly don't want it on my speakers. People will pay a premium to surf the adult Interent. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|