Supreme Court rules against Medical Marijuana

Shark · 2005-06-13, 09:06 PM

Don't know how in Canada, but in Israel it no legal. Personally was a smooker for long time. But now going to finish it , that staff fucks my life.... One problemm: finished smook and start drink.

mrMagoo · 2005-06-14, 10:13 AM

I'm really impressed by the reasoning the court uses in cases like this. Particularly a court that supposedly all hoped up on 'states rights'.

All narcotic type drug laws use to be state laws. Often used against minorities such as the Chinese, or the mary jane laws in the south against blacks.

The federal drug laws come under the interstate commerce clause of the constitution.

So what do pot growers in California that use it for medical reasons, but not to sell, especially in interstate commerce, have to do with the interstate commerce clause?

Well the government argued that by growing and distributing amongst themselves they are affecting the illegal interstate market!

You got reach deep where the sun don't shine to pull that one out

My prediction: The Feds will legislate that unmarried sex (or something like that) is illegal. They will argue that it they have the ability to regulate it since unmarried people having sex affect the interstate call girl market.

2005-06-13, 09:06 PM	#1
Shark And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Israel Posts: 226	Don't know how in Canada, but in Israel it no legal. Personally was a smooker for long time. But now going to finish it , that staff fucks my life.... One problemm: finished smook and start drink. __________________ Add sites to FreeSexHard Grant Domains

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-06-14, 10:13 AM	#2
mrMagoo Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Chicago Posts: 96	I'm really impressed by the reasoning the court uses in cases like this. Particularly a court that supposedly all hoped up on 'states rights'. All narcotic type drug laws use to be state laws. Often used against minorities such as the Chinese, or the mary jane laws in the south against blacks. The federal drug laws come under the interstate commerce clause of the constitution. So what do pot growers in California that use it for medical reasons, but not to sell, especially in interstate commerce, have to do with the interstate commerce clause? Well the government argued that by growing and distributing amongst themselves they are affecting the illegal interstate market! You got reach deep where the sun don't shine to pull that one out My prediction: The Feds will legislate that unmarried sex (or something like that) is illegal. They will argue that it they have the ability to regulate it since unmarried people having sex affect the interstate call girl market.