is 2257 means death for thumb tgp's ?

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by Greenguy

I think everyone is forgetting that the definition of "sexually explicit" as far as the content goes hasn't really be defined.

well 2 sponsors told me by email:
Explicit content includes actual
sexual conduct including all varieties of sexual intercourse,
vaginal, oral, anal, gay, straight, bestiality, masturbation
and sadistic or masochistic abuse. Also, any depictions
of the genitals would fall within this definition.
thats what ars4real told me.
and this is :
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT means, the showing of Pink or pubic area, and actual Sexual Acts.
what squirting carly told in her email to me. ackk those emails drive me nuts

[mrMagoo]

Originally Posted by stuveltje

well 2 sponsors told me by email:
Explicit content includes actual
sexual conduct including all varieties of sexual intercourse,
vaginal, oral, anal, gay, straight, bestiality, masturbation
and sadistic or masochistic abuse. Also, any depictions
of the genitals would fall within this definition.
thats what ars4real told me.
and this is :
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT means, the showing of Pink or pubic area, and actual Sexual Acts.
what squirting carly told in her email to me. ackk those emails drive me nuts

That is only some sponsors opinion or how they define it in terms of their relations with their affiliates.

Depiction of the genitals or pubic area is not necessarily sexually explicit for 2257.

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by mrMagoo

That is only some sponsors opinion or how they define it in terms of their relations with their affiliates.

Depiction of the genitals or pubic area is not necessarily sexually explicit for 2257.

yep but these sponsors are the one to tell me to remove their hardcore content and banners and i dont give a shit about the 2257, its not the 2257 for me its the sponsors now they forche me

[Useless]

Originally Posted by stuveltje

yep but these sponsors are the one to tell me to remove their hardcore content and banners and i dont give a shit about the 2257, its not the 2257 for me its the sponsors now they forche me

I'm right there with you stu. If it weren't for sponsors forcing me to pull their content, I wouldn't be pulling anything. The 2257 cops aren't going to find me hiding in Greenguy's backyard.

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I'm right there with you stu. If it weren't for sponsors forcing me to pull their content, I wouldn't be pulling anything. The 2257 cops aren't going to find me hiding in Greenguy's backyard.

oh your in GG backyard too?? i didnt see you no for real tht whole concept of the 2257 is one big bullshit, although i can understand the US webmaster...i think, on this moment its realy the sponsors, they say hey, remove the hardcore banners ad the free content, yeah easy how the fuck do i replace content and banner shit from more then 250 free sites in 9 days , hey i am not superwoman, oke sometimes i am but if they woldnt forche me ye then i didnt have anything t remove, and i still can kick myself i never started to use only my bought content

[ardentgent]

Originally Posted by stuveltje

well 2 sponsors told me by email:
Explicit content includes actual
sexual conduct including all varieties of sexual intercourse,
vaginal, oral, anal, gay, straight, bestiality, masturbation
and sadistic or masochistic abuse. Also, any depictions
of the genitals would fall within this definition.
thats what ars4real told me.
and this is :
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT means, the showing of Pink or pubic area, and actual Sexual Acts.
what squirting carly told in her email to me. ackk those emails drive me nuts

I have seen that ars post but the regulations exempt letter E of 2256 which defines sexually explicit conduct. E says lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person. So I don't know why they are saying that depictions
of the genitals would fall within the definition of sexually explicit.

[Useless]

I'm just amused by ARS's highly scientific and legalistic use of "the showing of Pink or pubic area". How about lavender? And what about fuschia? Am I also to assume that particurlary hairy women are exempt? It's ok to show a muff with enough hair to house a family of squirrels, but if she's shaved clean, she's got to go...