Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2005-06-20, 06:33 PM   #1
Toby
Lonewolf Internet Sales
 
Toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,826
Send a message via ICQ to Toby
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemmy
While I'm willing to take reasonable steps to make sure kids can't access my sites this is first and foremost the parents' responsibility.
True, and by placing the ICRA pic-label meta on your pages you've provided a simple and effective means for parents to do that. Also, if it ever becomes necessary, I can show the judge that I've made a concerted effort to keep my content away from minors.
Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-20, 07:51 PM   #2
Linkster
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
 
Linkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sex Delta
Posts: 5,084
Send a message via ICQ to Linkster
I hate to piss in your wheaties here - but 2257 has nothing whatsoever with keeping kids away from porn sites on the net - that is a completely different legislation that was killed by the supreme court a few years back
And actually I think you will find most WMs do use the PICs label on their larger sites that would normally get into search engines etc

So I guess Im a little confused about what the hell all of this talk about PICs labels and joining the ASACP has anything to do with filing the 2257 TRO (not injunction as the thread states) Im not trying to be a jerk as I think they are both worthy causes and deserve their place in seperate threads
__________________
Pussy Chompers
Porn Links
NSCash
Linkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-20, 08:30 PM   #3
WannaShagg
If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English
 
WannaShagg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 36
Wink I think 2257 needs a swift overhaul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkster
I hate to piss in your wheaties here - but 2257 has nothing whatsoever with keeping kids away from porn sites on the net - that is a completely different legislation that was killed by the supreme court a few years back
And actually I think you will find most WMs do use the PICs label on their larger sites that would normally get into search engines etc

So I guess Im a little confused about what the hell all of this talk about PICs labels and joining the ASACP has anything to do with filing the 2257 TRO (not injunction as the thread states) Im not trying to be a jerk as I think they are both worthy causes and deserve their place in seperate threads
I understand what it's about. I also have a right to privacy by not disclosing my personal info. I am a webmaster and a producer of my own images. I also have an affiliate program. So it is not that I am unaware of what this is all about. I am directly affected and will not give out my ID. It is also my contention that the burden of making sure a model is of age has been grossly misplaced. Ultimately a producer can make a fake ID, the model can give a fake ID. How am I supposed to know what I am looking at. So if passed to me, all might look just spiffy, when in reality it may not be a legitimate document. So if it is not real am I still going to jail? Furthermore, unless you are taking the pics you will be hard pressed to stop use of under age models. Suppose the reason the FSC is pursuing this issue is because they feel similarly. And in the end the adult webmaster should not bear the burden of verifying the legitimacy of a models age or documents as they can well be bogus. Instead, we should concentrate on what we can change like making sure under age surfers can't access our sites. The 2257 needs a good swift rethinking. On one had you have the right to privacy, what it's all about. And then the same supreme power that maintains you have this right, is trying to take it away. Place the burden of 2257 back where it belongs and let us worry about keeping minors out of our sites. If a shaddy producer is shaddy, then what would it matter to them what the age of the model is, or if they are providing us with credible documentation. This is why I say 2257 is putting the burden quite wrongly on people that have nothing to do with it. Focus on what is in our control, like ICRA lableing. And stop trying to violate my rights. Additionally FSC feels that thier rights are being discriminated against. So as citizens, we all have the same rights. So now the FSC is discriminating against anyone not supporting them. It's all a totally double edged sword. And all of us can be 2257 compliant to the nines, and it will not stop the use of under age models, becuase the crimianls doing it are no where near this board or 2257. Unless you are holding the camera you should not have to prove models ages. What you can do is make sure minors do not enter your sites. And of course use reasonible discretion and record keeping to ensure you are not knowingly distributing pics of minors. The ultimate responsibilty is the producers not mine. Thanks and have a great day.
__________________
Peace, Candy
http://www.candyscuntlipcash.com/
WannaShagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-06-20, 09:46 PM   #4
koolkat
Remember to rebel against the authorities, kids!
 
koolkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 401
Injunction... TRO... it doesn't really matter. The point is that the FSC is playing the "sky is falling" scenario, and that if we don't pay money to join them, then we would are screwed because we can still be prosecuted, even if their members win. I think that is the biggest crock of shit, and as long as they are only doing this for their "members" and not all webmasters, then I will not give them one penny!
__________________
Harry Beaver's Lodge
koolkat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc