|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
I hate to piss in your wheaties here - but 2257 has nothing whatsoever with keeping kids away from porn sites on the net - that is a completely different legislation that was killed by the supreme court a few years back
And actually I think you will find most WMs do use the PICs label on their larger sites that would normally get into search engines etc So I guess Im a little confused about what the hell all of this talk about PICs labels and joining the ASACP has anything to do with filing the 2257 TRO (not injunction as the thread states) Im not trying to be a jerk as I think they are both worthy causes and deserve their place in seperate threads |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 36
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Remember to rebel against the authorities, kids!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 401
|
Injunction... TRO... it doesn't really matter. The point is that the FSC is playing the "sky is falling" scenario, and that if we don't pay money to join them, then we would are screwed because we can still be prosecuted, even if their members win. I think that is the biggest crock of shit, and as long as they are only doing this for their "members" and not all webmasters, then I will not give them one penny!
__________________
Harry Beaver's Lodge |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|