Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2005-08-11, 12:14 AM   #1
Preacher
There's Xanax in my thurible!
 
Preacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever they screw on my head
Posts: 2,441
Send a message via ICQ to Preacher
And exactly how is the DOJ going to know what material was produced prior to June 23rd 2005? I suppose they'll just take our word.

This post was created prior to June 23rd, 2005 ignore the invalid timestamp above.
__________________
NSCash * This Depraved World
Preacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-11, 12:26 AM   #2
Maj. Stress
Progress rarely comes in buckets, it normally comes in teaspoons
 
Maj. Stress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dark Side Of Naboo
Posts: 1,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Preacher
And exactly how is the DOJ going to know what material was produced prior to June 23rd 2005? I suppose they'll just take our word.
Exactly what I was thinking. The positive side of this is the doj is back peddling.
Maj. Stress is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-12, 10:40 AM   #3
lassiter
I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman!
 
lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 473
Send a message via ICQ to lassiter Send a message via Yahoo to lassiter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Preacher
And exactly how is the DOJ going to know what material was produced prior to June 23rd 2005? I suppose they'll just take our word.
Um...record-keeping requirements have been in effect all along. A primary producer (at least) needs to have valid, signed model releases with the date of production listed for every photo set or video they make or distribute, whether shot before June 23, 2005 or after, and those documents have been and are subject to inspection. I'd guess that secondary producers using "actually explicit" pre-June 2005 content had better have at least a clickable link to the 2257 info on the relevant primary producers' sites - at least until the secondary producer issues get settled.
lassiter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-12, 01:36 PM   #4
Preacher
There's Xanax in my thurible!
 
Preacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wherever they screw on my head
Posts: 2,441
Send a message via ICQ to Preacher
Sorry, yes to clarify I was thinking of secondary producer's, specifically freesites linking to 2257 pages off site.
__________________
NSCash * This Depraved World
Preacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc