Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2005-08-19, 01:52 PM   #9
Useless
Certified Nice Person
 
Useless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dirty Undies, NY
Posts: 11,268
Send a message via ICQ to Useless
Quote:
Originally Posted by madleinx
I believe that the law is against the distribution of obscenity (through the internet, mail, or otherwise). Hardcore pornography is not explicitly defined as obscenity, which is based on the "Miller Test" of 1973. And the recent decision in the Extreme Associatiates case may have messed up Miller as well.

Or am I interpreting all of that incorrectly?
That is my understanding of it as well. Obscenity has always been determined on a case by case basis since it is so subjective. DA's tend to stay away from obscenity cases because they almost always go the way of the defendant. (Thank you Mr. Flynt )
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.
Useless is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc