What did i do wrong?

[former surffer]

Thanks UW, that is helpful.
I don't usually look at other sties for limitations, but for possabilities.

I did a survey of the 202 free site links on the Nude Babes page.
(cus that's where i'd like our site to be listed)
Yes, Most link back from the warning page,(i knew that)
7 link back from other pages,
3 have dedicated links pages (as we do, but i expected more sites to have them)
Surprisingly, 52 (1/4) don't link back at all.
Of the 8 "Recommended Free Sites" only 1 links back.

Of course we do, and will continue to, link back.
But i prefer to keep our warning page free of adult links. No adult options for the non-adults to follow.
Would it be acceptable to have a separate warning page just for link lists?
Under the assumption that the non-adults have already been turned away by the time they got to the list?
Probably not, why have a warning at all, in that case.

I was less through in checking page counts, but i only found one site with more than 4 pages.
http://www.tommys-bookmarks.com/gallery/
Brings up the questions: Is there a problem with having more than 4 pages?
Why couldn't i have our main site listed? Instead of a phony 2 page throw-away?

Again, I wish you had left me in the newbe section. I'm looking for advise from peers.
Not "help" from a competitor. (Torn)
I missed his reference to the 800pixel rule, cus he hid it behind an undeserved RTFM and insults to our site.
I thought we were within 800 pixels, but i have now re-checked.
Ok, there it is, a table on the main page that's 815 pixels.
COOL, i can fix that and re-submit.
Why cop an attitude about it?

What's his other complaint? We're different from the other sites?
GOOD!
I want us to stand out from the crowd.

Of course, the opinion that counts here is GreenGuy's.

- Former Surffer