?? for Free site submitters

[MadMax]

For the record, while I've been burning through my backlog of submissions (from 6 weeks down to 10 days, FUCK YEAH ), I've had to decline a bunch of sites because my recip was removed before I ever reviewed the site. Food for thought

[Surfn]

If my bot finds a listed site missing my recip it removes it and all sites from that submitters IP.

[Mr. Blue]

Build...submit...review which ones list you regularly...edit your database accordingly...but it seems like a wasted effort to go back and remove 1 recip.

[juggernaut]

Originally Posted by MadMax

For the record, while I've been burning through my backlog of submissions (from 6 weeks down to 10 days, FUCK YEAH ), I've had to decline a bunch of sites because my recip was removed before I ever reviewed the site. Food for thought

NO NO lol I know some LL take time to review, thats cool with me. What I meant is getting a mail saying its rejected with no reason why. I was thinking like that what has already been mentioned here that its a waste of time to remove one recip and then have to replace it with another. But wanted to see what the norm is. I tend to go on the set it and forget it theory but just got to thinking that if someone rejects it why leave it with the possibility of sending them back traffic and the little bit of SE that would spider the site and help them with the back link for no reason. But like I said, just wondering what the norm was. I think I'm going to stay with the set it and forget it practice, unless the rejects get out of hand. I mean if you have a bunch of FS over time that can get to be a real pain in the ass to monitor that stuff. And I would think over time the traffic you would be getting to that FS would not be much being it would be way way way down the list. I do have my little excel spreadsheet with all the little reds and blues going so I for me, if it's rejected with no reason I just place the Yellow next to it meaning don't submit again.

[neveremail]

Originally Posted by juggernaut

NO NO lol I know some LL take time to review, thats cool with me. What I meant is getting a mail saying its rejected with no reason why. I was thinking like that what has already been mentioned here that its a waste of time to remove one recip and then have to replace it with another. But wanted to see what the norm is. I tend to go on the set it and forget it theory but just got to thinking that if someone rejects it why leave it with the possibility of sending them back traffic and the little bit of SE that would spider the site and help them with the back link for no reason. But like I said, just wondering what the norm was. I think I'm going to stay with the set it and forget it practice, unless the rejects get out of hand. I mean if you have a bunch of FS over time that can get to be a real pain in the ass to monitor that stuff. And I would think over time the traffic you would be getting to that FS would not be much being it would be way way way down the list. I do have my little excel spreadsheet with all the little reds and blues going so I for me, if it's rejected with no reason I just place the Yellow next to it meaning don't submit again.

Why not take the time to find out where you went wrong. Most of the big LLs just dont have time to be telling everyone why they were rejected but if you email them or ask on here you will usually find out why. Then you can either change what your doing to get listed or if you find the rejection reason to be unreasonable you can then stop submitting. Seems better to make an informed decision rather than just righting off potential traffic.