 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
2005-12-03, 01:28 AM
|
#1 |
|
Took the hint.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
 |
Em, I had a sponsor a few years ago try to pull the same deal (basically said I must be sending fraudulent signups because not enough trials were converting).
I asked them to check the source of the traffic. It was almost entirely their hosted galleries. My account with them has been doing quite well ever since. Alex |
|
|
|
2005-12-03, 05:15 AM
|
#2 | |
|
If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada eh!
Posts: 915
 |
Quote:
I had the same thing happen to me way way back in the first few years of my LL - I was livid and shocked at the accusations but did nothing about it. Wonder if it is the same outfit? (The joke is on them tho... I resigned up with them back in July and they are now my 2nd best converting and money making sponsor right now - go figure!) I dont understand how they can accuse us of fraud. I still maintain it isnt my job to convert the sale. I can do everything in my power with the sales pitch and get the surfer to at least have a look to see what he might be missing - but ultimately it is the sponsors job to get the perve to sign up. If the tour just sucks then its their fault! just my 2 cents.. err 1 cent (canadian) |
|
|
|
|
|
2005-12-03, 01:14 PM
|
#3 |
|
If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada eh!
Posts: 915
|
New Update:
Good news on the Sponsor VS Emmy saga! Got an email from the owner of the program saying the problem was on their end and a check will be cut on Monday.  |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
