Filthy Earl's Filthy Fucking Rejections Thread

[Useless]

Ah, that was me getting a little touchy towards the end of my 2 month back-logged queue. Take a look at the recip table and think about the content of the site. The site itself is fine, but that recip table doesn't belong to that site. Earl doesn't use category-specific recips anymore (as you obviously know), so it's not a big deal to my list, and I usually wouldn't base my review on whether or not other lists are going to list the free site, but I do wonder if anyone else noticed that little faux paux and rejected you for it. If you resubmit it, I'll list it as is. I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of that oopsy.

[koalat]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

Ah, that was me getting a little touchy towards the end of my 2 month back-logged queue. Take a look at the recip table and think about the content of the site. The site itself is fine, but that recip table doesn't belong to that site. Earl doesn't use category-specific recips anymore (as you obviously know), so it's not a big deal to my list, and I usually wouldn't base my review on whether or not other lists are going to list the free site, but I do wonder if anyone else noticed that little faux paux and rejected you for it. If you resubmit it, I'll list it as is. I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of that oopsy.

Wow. Thanks for pointing that out! That's quite the oopsy. Do you think it's cool if I just upload the new index.html file with the appropriate links, or is that a no no???

[Useless]

Generally, that should be fine. As you know, many lists employ bots that will flag sites that have made changes since being listed. I believe that most lists would simply take a quick glance at it to verify that it still meets the rules and unflag the site. Small changes and updates are not uncommon in the free site world.