Regarding "Roman Maroni" reason once again

[Useless]

Originally Posted by ecchi

I am assuming from your anger that you run a link list and would not stoop to these tactics, which is good, but not everyone is as good as you.

Do you submit free sites? I need to know who made you so damned cynical about link list owners.

Originally Posted by ecchi

...but if you have some spare time look through a few other link lists, and you will see that not everyone is as honest as you.

What does that even mean? Some veil will be lifted and the seedy underworld of link lists will be revealed if he surfs a few link lists?

Originally Posted by ecchi

Although it is nice to see someone who is still naive enough to believe that all webmasters are honest, and who refuses to believe that any other link list owner would stoop to tactics like this. However for your own benefit you need to be a bit less trusting of human nature, or someone will screw you over big time one day.

That's just plain insulting. Don't call the man naive just because you have some twisted perception of how link lists are run. Link lists WANT to link to the free sites that are submitted. We need good content to build and maintain traffic. You never see anyone posting perfectly good rule-abiding free sites while complaining that they haven't been listed. Do you think that we have good submitters snuffed out if we can't come up with an excuse for not linking back? Your whole argument is baseless, preposterous, and completely unfair.