Kind of important

[Toby]

Originally Posted by SirMoby

It would be interesting to hear from AFF on this one. She looks young enough to disturb me.

Agree, and it's doubly disturbing that AFF would choose to use that in a promo. It's enough of an issue that iFriends has a policy on not accepting camhosts that "appear to be under 18" even if they've provided complete proof they are of age.

[Sagi_AFF]

The models used in those particular GEO ads are StreamRay Cam girls who must submit two forms of ID in order to work with StreamRay.

[SirMoby]

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF

The models used in those particular GEO ads are StreamRay Cam girls who must submit two forms of ID in order to work with StreamRay.

I'm sure that she's over age but I don't like her looking so young. I know that's just my personal preference.

Are you saying that AFF does NOT have a copy of her IDs on file and that you're relying on a third party to verify the age of models in your promotional material?

[Sagi_AFF]

Originally Posted by SirMoby

I'm sure that she's over age but I don't like her looking so young. I know that's just my personal preference.

Are you saying that AFF does NOT have a copy of her IDs on file and that you're relying on a third party to verify the age of models in your promotional material?

The images are hosted by StreamRay. You should also know that last year StreamRay and FriendFinder Inc merged and are now owned by the same parent company Various Inc. So essentially AFF does have a copy of all the IDs. I have sent an e-mail to 2257@streamray.com just to verify the age of this model.

[SirMoby]

Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF

The images are hosted by StreamRay. You should also know that last year StreamRay and FriendFinder Inc merged and are now owned by the same parent company Various Inc. So essentially AFF does have a copy of all the IDs. I have sent an e-mail to 2257@streamray.com just to verify the age of this model.

That makes sense.

[Halfdeck]

She does look underage to me, and I wouldn't use that banner. Still, there's nothing in the text "innocentleila" that implies she's underage. If AFF has her valid ID then that's good enough for me. It might still be a good idea to remove her from the ad and create a teen niche filter for webmasters that want to filter out portraits of youngish looking models.

[Toby]

Originally Posted by Halfdeck

...Still, there's nothing in the text "innocentleila" that implies she's underage.

By itself no, but in combination with the youthful appearance...

Perhaps I go a little beyond the line on this topic. I don't even allow the words "teen" or "young" to be used on galleries submitted to my TGP's. I'd rather there not be any question about the content on my sites in regards to age of the models.