 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
2006-06-30, 06:31 PM
|
#1 |
|
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,773
  |
I can only speak from the single experience I had but my blog did do better once I made it a "sub-domain" but there are probably a million factors that I'm not aware of as to why that was.
Oh...and thank you Last edited by walrus; 2006-06-30 at 06:37 PM.. |
|
|
|
2006-06-30, 07:29 PM
|
#2 |
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10
|
A subdomain would be much better for a variety of reasons. What it comes doen to is that it makes your blog appear like its own website rather than a page on another website. That has multiple benefits.
How you make it happen depends on your hosting setup. Do you have a control panel you can use? |
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 10:34 AM
|
#3 | |
|
With $10,000, we'd be millionaires! We could buy all kinds of useful things like ... love!
|
Quote:
With the low price of domain names, why not just get a completely seperate domain? If it is being used as an extension of a main site, tagging the word 'blog' or 'diary' on the end would work, rather than using a subdomain. i.e. in Amber's case redhotblog.com or red-hot-blog.com would appear to be an extension of her sites. *Just a thought about my experience using subdomains.
__________________
Playboy Webmasters - The name says it all! $35 per signup or 60% revshare. |
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-03, 12:01 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Rock stars ... is there anything they don't know?
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
 But in my experience, they see a subdomain as being far more like its own site than something in a subdirectory. A subdirectory just looks like a page that is 1-deep, it seems. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
