|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
Has anyone come across anything like a plain language explanation of what the secondary producers will have to do to comply, written for secondary producers, and not for lawyers?
I haven't. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
They just keep making 2257 an even bigger mess. It's going to take some time and lots of money for lawyers, but I don't see much chance for most of this law, as it pertains to 2257, holding up under legal challenge. I think we'll see an injunction against this new part too. I'd guess that it will be the major topic of discussion at the legal seminar during Internext. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,914
|
That doesn't really answer the questions a secondary producer has to ask...
Is it retroactive? What is the effective date? Are there any differences between the records requirements of 2257 and 4472? Any special specifications for record keeping added by 4472? Will there be any changes in the types of records content producers provide? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||||
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|