 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
2006-12-01, 07:38 AM
|
#1 |
|
Bonged
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BrisVegas, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,882
|
DangerDave said:-
09/03/2005 - "Everyone hates NATS! cause it sucks!" 14/08/2005 - "I fukin hate NATS!" 01/12/2005 - "NATS = the natural enemy of the hard-working webmaster" 26/05/2006 - "NATS is a gimic/toy for program owners" 09/07/2006 - "NATS sucks!" 26/11/2006 - "That piece of shit that is Nats.. wont dump the free sites.." .. and don't even talk to me about the fucking stupid timeouts everyone sets!! Sheesh! DD |
|
|
|
2006-12-01, 09:16 AM
|
#2 |
|
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sex Delta
Posts: 5,084
 |
More importantly - that listing of fees also includes the built in error that NATs has where in the site by site listing you show a rebill at full price - but when the surfer cancels but decides to take the lower offer (which some sponsors do) it still gets added in the top list as a full price rebill - but then gets subtracted out as part of the "processing fees". Thats why places like Deecash will show sometimes a 50% proc fee for a period - all the rebills are cancelling but then taking their "second chance offer"
Greenie - that would probably explain that change in percentage youre seeing on that one company as it wouldnt be a chargeback - and NAts just always shows it as the full month rebill price even though it really wasnt This is just another reason Ive often considered just pulling all sponsors that use Nats - too easy to play with the numbers Last edited by Linkster; 2006-12-01 at 09:19 AM.. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
