A Google question...I've never seen this before

Bill · 2004-01-20, 11:11 PM

Actually I've seen something like it a fair number of times, seen it especially in some older mainstream work I've done, I have always associated it with google deciding which of the two it is going to list, and which it will devalue for similarity.

In the past I've seen and had disappointments when google rejected the version I was trying to emphasize.

The solution is, as others have said, to be consistent in your use of the two versions in linking. I try to avoid the use of the shorter version, as my experience is that the creamy surfers tend to add the www.

But this is new algo time (that is, google keeps experimenting with minor variations, thus "new algo".), so who knows what is really happening in this case.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2004-01-20, 11:11 PM	#9
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	Actually I've seen something like it a fair number of times, seen it especially in some older mainstream work I've done, I have always associated it with google deciding which of the two it is going to list, and which it will devalue for similarity. In the past I've seen and had disappointments when google rejected the version I was trying to emphasize. The solution is, as others have said, to be consistent in your use of the two versions in linking. I try to avoid the use of the shorter version, as my experience is that the creamy surfers tend to add the www. But this is new algo time (that is, google keeps experimenting with minor variations, thus "new algo".), so who knows what is really happening in this case.