I feel dumb asking this question (CCbill related)

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by DamnQ

and u cats complain about complex nats linking codes? LOL

No offense to rollergirl, but 99.44% of webmasters that use CCBill know how to code their links.

On the same note, .56% of webmasters know what the random letters mean in a NATS code

[Qon]

Originally Posted by Greenie

No offense to rollergirl, but 99.44% of webmasters that use CCBill know how to code their links.

On the same note, .56% of webmasters know what the random letters mean in a NATS code

u of all people should know statistics are devisive and really don't amount to much of anything but a tool people use to make it "sound" like they know what they are talking about. a lot of webmasters who THINK they know how to code ccbill links often have it wrong (i know i did for a while and i'm quite obviously no noob).... with nats, there's no "building" a link and who cares what the nats random letters MEAN?? as long as they WORK.... and if u don't LIKE the code, see my post above... use the un-encoded links. man, y'all sound like girls cryin' about something sooooooo simple.

[lassiter]

Originally Posted by Greenie

On the same note, .56% of webmasters know what the random letters mean in a NATS code

Actually, the one webmaster who figured out the meaning on his own tore out both his eyes and jumped to his death from a bridge.