|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
I think you're missing the point here as well - a lot of us have done our own investigating & most (if not all) of the time, the problem involves a program using NATS.
If most of us see that our ratios & income drop when a program moves to NATS...... |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little... push.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 1,679
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
~Warm and Fuzzy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Operator! Give me the number for 911!
|
GG, the point is, most affiliates using NATS *can't* see a real drop in ratios, otherwise NATS would be a dead duck, and it would have been a dead duck long ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
The Original Greenguy (Est'd 1996) & AVN HOF Member - I Crop Pics For Thumbs In My Sleep
|
Quote:
I do have a stats run of 20 NATS programs with pre & post totals, but I'm waiting on one more person to get me their stats before I post it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Operator! Give me the number for 911!
|
The point remains that if ratios were so bad across the board, NATS would not be as used as it is. And it isn't popular with sponsors because it gives them tools to shave affiliates, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Certified Nice Person
|
Quote:
__________________
Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Operator! Give me the number for 911!
|
Well, I don't know how you could agree with something I never said, but aside from that, I don't think NATS is perfect, and neither do I think CCBill are perfect. What I would like to see is more constructive input to address issues and concerns. That would benefit everyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them.
|
Quote:
Youre right - its not popular because of that - its popular because its cheap - any idiot can start a program using it without ever doing any programming on the back end(which unfortunately a lot do) Also - comparing it to ccbill isnt a real comparison tool as they are two different things - while ccbill does give a few tools to look at it is not an an affilate program software standalone - it is a processor that gives a few tools and thats it - apples and oranges. As far as the shaving - while it may not have anything built in - any monkey programmer can take care of that pretty easily - just like any other program out there - not saying its the programs fault - its just people are people - and if it can be done they are going to do it. Ya know a long time ago someone in this industry (I think it was around 1999 or so) called me on the phone cause I had made a post at another board about one program back then that I had caught shaving - and he said real simple - why point out just one program? - they all shave - you just have to figure out how much and figure that into your biz model ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|