Join price in link texts?

[JackDaniel's]

As long as it isn't a blind link I don't see a reason for a decline.

Many webmasters include the price in their text links

[Lemmy]

No reason to decline here. I've tried with and w/o including trial price with no discernible difference in clicks.

[ladydesigner]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

No reason to decline here. I've tried with and w/o including trial price with no discernible difference in clicks.

Same here.

On a side note, make sure the link isn't blind (I would consider the example you provided blind) and you'll be fine.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by OneWhoKnows

"Get instant access to all of her pics for only $3.95"?

How is that blind?

Originally Posted by ladydesigner

Same here.

On a side note, make sure the link isn't blind (I would consider the example you provided blind) and you'll be fine.

The surfer is told they will have to pay $3.95 to access all the pics. That's pretty straight up to me. |confused|

[dareutwo]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

How is that blind?
The surfer is told they will have to pay $3.95 to access all the pics. That's pretty straight up to me. |confused|

Where? Billy Bob's having fun with corn again?, or a sponsor site?
@
AT
at

[KG Gary]

Originally Posted by Licker4U

How is that blind?
The surfer is told they will have to pay $3.95 to access all the pics. That's pretty straight up to me. |confused|

To build on dareutwo's point...
The link tells the surfer what he gets, but NOT where he's going, thus it can be considered blind.

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by dareutwo

Where? Billy Bob's having fun with corn again?, or a sponsor site?
@
AT
at

No, not Billy Bob but the place where you pay $3.95 to get access to all her pics.

Originally Posted by KG Gary

To build on dareutwo's point...
The link tells the surfer what he gets, but NOT where he's going, thus it can be considered blind.

That's not telling the surfer where he's going? A site where he will have to pay to see her pics?

[KG Gary]

Not really, at least not in the eyes of a crazy-freesite-hardened reviewer.


It tells him he's going to A site but not the name of the site.
Some reviewers may let it slide but others want to see the name there every time, hence dareutwo's at, AT, @ comment.

[Fonz]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

No reason to decline here. I've tried with and w/o including trial price with no discernible difference in clicks.

Hmmm... I always thought this would give you less but more productive clicks. I guess that's why testing was invented