| 
| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless 
			
			
		
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				US Man Faces Online Porn Charges
			 
			This is really unsettling. I can't really figure out what he did wrong except for not actually putting the custodian of records on the DVDs themselves. But is that necessarily a case for obscenity?  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			![]() http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/2007...wjOCjn2S9k24cA 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	NichePass.com: 350+ sites, 4000+ promo tools, $50 per trials Sign Up Now!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Lonewolf Internet Sales 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 This is an obscenity charge, it has nothing to do with 2257 or custodian of records. The DOJ is saying he distributed obscene material. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless 
			
			
		
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 I know that, that's why I'm confused. It says he was charged with obscenity charges and then it goes on to say that the reason was because he didn't label the DVDs with the Custodian of Records. So what does that have to do with obscenity?  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			To me it just sounds like they were out to throw any charges against him they could to see which one would stick. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	NichePass.com: 350+ sites, 4000+ promo tools, $50 per trials Sign Up Now!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 If there is nobody out there, that's a lot of real estate going to waste! 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2003 
				
				
				
					Posts: 2,177
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Don't see all the details in the link. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	A few months ago the DOJ burned themselves because they were caught also distributing "obsence" materials that they were trying to bring charges against some company(Castle???) for doing. Something about bankruptcy management, and distributing the same titles. Do as I say, not as I do! ![]()  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Lonewolf Internet Sales 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#6 | ||
| 
			
			
			
			 Certified Nice Person 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	Click here to purchase a bridge I'm selling.  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand! 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Wow, that is kind of scary. I wonder, is there really reason to be paranoid about what it is we do? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#8 | |
| 
			
			
			
			 Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless 
			
			
		
			
				
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2005 
				
				
				
					Posts: 21
				 
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 		
			
			 | 
		#9 | 
| 
			
			
			
			 Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless 
			
			
		
			
			
								
		
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
		 After re-reading the article, I realized there were multiple counts against him and I became un-confused. LOL 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			And if he was indeed distributing scat movies then it's less disturbing that he's being indicted. I just assumed it was straightforward hetero porn. 
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	NichePass.com: 350+ sites, 4000+ promo tools, $50 per trials Sign Up Now!  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread | 
		
  | 
	
		
  |