|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
Next time you can shoot me a PM; that way, you can keep your keywords private.
Your site still ranks for all those keywords but at 100+ positions and your home page doesn't rank at all for them. Google is basically returning the second best result from your site for all three searches instead of the best result (the home page, in all three cases). For example, hoe_profiles/sarah/black_hoe_sarah.htm ranks for "black hoes." If you do a site:domain keyword search, you'll see that url is the second best result. Is Google suppressing your home page from ranking? Who knows. A search for most of the words from the title tag of your home page: "round brown hoes ebony babes with big black booty" should return your home page relatively high in the result, but it doesn't. Your home page still ranks first for the keywords in the domain name, "round brown hoes." I see a few minor problems (e.g. no www/non-www redirect installed) but nothing major that would warrant a penalty. I think just wait a week or two to see if the home page at least pops up in search results for those keywords; if not, like I said, you might want to run a few link trades targeting those specific keywords and see what happens. Of course, link trades can both help and harm a site. I'd ask a link trade partner to do more than just add a link to your site in his/her page footer (e.g. write a short paragraph and embed your link inside it). I'd also avoid offering links on roundbrownhoes.com (like I said, offer links from pages on your other domains; for example, a link from within a blog post would look the most natural to Google. If a post is more than 3 months old and has decent TBPR, I'm sure someone will accept links from that page; besides, the anchor text from pages like that, even with TBPR 0 can be more powerful than links in the footer on a TBPR 7 page, as long as the page isn't supplemental). Quote:
__________________
Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiasm. Last edited by Halfdeck; 2007-08-19 at 06:12 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|