The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II

Greenguy · 2008-01-28, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horney

Hi, folks, got a rejection based on category, which I could use some help with. I put This site linked here under "Public Nudity" and it's two girls flashing their bodies on a public highway, using a car as a prop. Where can I find a better definition of what public nudity should be, and how to categorise sites like this which could really go into any one of three or four categories, on the face of it. In fact, as a newcomer, a list of definitions would be very useful if anyone knows of one...

Would you believe me if I said my reviewer was being too cautious?

I'll have it listed with the next update.

Quote:

Originally Posted by horney

...There is also the one linked here. I submitted it and got your automated reply to my email address on 16 Jan, while you were all away, but have never received an official acceptance or rejection letter. Did it get lost in the system, or has it been rejected? I need to know on what basis to resubmit, i.e. whether to make changes first...

Do you remember which category you submitted this one too? If it wasn't TeenSologirls then that's the reason (which is the same problem as above)

I have a couple of Sologirl categories that are for Free Sites that promote the paysite of a specific model/girl (a sologirl site) So anytime we see submits come in that belong in a sologirl category, we reject it.

And, as dumb as this sounds, this current manner of thinking may change in the near future - but for now, Free Sites promoting a Sologirl have to be submitted into a Sologirl category.

horney · 2008-01-28, 12:14 PM

Thanks, Greenie. I'll have another go at getting the earlier one right.

horney · 2008-01-28, 09:23 PM

Hi, I'm back, already.

Got another rejection which says refer to webmaster and the help on different rejections says that's one to post here. This is the link and the free site is about a girl sticking toys up herself. The pics aren't strictly in order, for visual impact and layout, but I doubt if that's the reason.

What have I done this time? |badidea|

Greenguy · 2008-01-29, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horney

Hi, I'm back, already.

Got another rejection which says refer to webmaster and the help on different rejections says that's one to post here. This is the link and the free site is about a girl sticking toys up herself. The pics aren't strictly in order, for visual impact and layout, but I doubt if that's the reason.

What have I done this time? |badidea|

I think it's one of 2 things (or both) The text box with the warning text in it is left aligned (rest of the page is centered) and the 1st pic in gallery 2 doesn't go with the rest of the pics.

horney · 2008-01-29, 11:26 AM

Ah. OK, thanks, greenie. I've fixed the first one - that's an IE bug I was going back to fix the stylesheet for anyway. I'll fix the pic and resubmit.

Cheers.

horney · 2008-01-29, 10:33 PM

You've got me stumped. The text is centred - I've checked in IE6 which is the worst wrecker of good web sites since IE5 and is now so far out of date I'm getting just a few visitors using it. My site works. I've swapped the images, and they all go together.

Thanks for looking and responding so quickly, but since you told me what was wrong and I fixed it, what's it about?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2008-01-28, 12:14 PM	#2
horney Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip! Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 111	Thanks, Greenie. I'll have another go at getting the earlier one right.

2008-01-28, 09:23 PM	#3
horney Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip! Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 111	Hi, I'm back, already. Got another rejection which says refer to webmaster and the help on different rejections says that's one to post here. This is the link and the free site is about a girl sticking toys up herself. The pics aren't strictly in order, for visual impact and layout, but I doubt if that's the reason. What have I done this time? \|badidea\|

2008-01-29, 11:26 AM	#5
horney Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip! Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 111	Ah. OK, thanks, greenie. I've fixed the first one - that's an IE bug I was going back to fix the stylesheet for anyway. I'll fix the pic and resubmit. Cheers.

2008-01-29, 10:33 PM	#6
horney Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip! Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 111	You've got me stumped. The text is centred - I've checked in IE6 which is the worst wrecker of good web sites since IE5 and is now so far out of date I'm getting just a few visitors using it. My site works. I've swapped the images, and they all go together. Thanks for looking and responding so quickly, but since you told me what was wrong and I fixed it, what's it about?