A>B>C Recips for linklists?

[xxxjay]

Originally Posted by spacemanspiff

I'm not sure what you're saying here JD. It's bad for business when LL reject freesites with ABC recips, or it's bad for business for FS builders to use those types of recips.

Personally, I think the traditional LL model is in the shitter right now (at least compared to what it used to be), and I wonder why every time someone comes up with a new idea a lot of folks dig in their heels.

I think Jay's idea has merit, and should be explored.

Thanks man, I doubt there is anyone that can say they are doing better now than they were 5 years ago. You have to shake things up once in a while.

Does everything have to stay in 1999? The rest of the internet has moved on and evolved. I still pay a reviewer more than enough so other people get free traffic.

Snizzshare is a 100% legit (abliet fake) "tube" site, it damn sure is no Redtube or Tube 8. After some surfer sees pornhub.com do you think they will every go back to a linklist again?

That all aside, the linking methods we use worked great 5 years ago, but Google is hip to recip linking and it will actually hurt you. Don't believe me, read up:

http://www.webmasterworld.com/link_d...nt/3434655.htm

http://www.knoge.com/make-money-onli...dont-work.html

Hell just look "Google Repicolal Linking":
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...procal+linking

Why do we insist on sticking to a method that just dooms up to failure?

That's the one thing that really frustrates me with this who linklist game is most people refusal to evolve.

Just so nobody gets their panties in a wad I am re-doing my link tables this week back to just normal recips.