Cleo, you're lucky. In the UK I have to pay equivalent $300 pa for terrestrial tv, plus $1000 for satellite, $1500 for water, and the list goes on. Plus we have something called council tax. For anyone who lives in the UK, would you like to guess what that is for a 10 bedroom home?
I do see what you're saying though. If you want quality, you have to pay for it. Sure.
Trouble is, there is a demand for free porn. Quite a large one. This means that software developers will be encouraged to make their programs more user-friendly. This will make getting high-quality, free porn, very easy. In this scenario, it would be - why pay for quality? Quality is free.
So, my point is that sponsor sites will soon need to change from the cookie cutter bullshit. It just wont fly very shortly. It's going to be painful, might even require imagination and intelligence, bu sponsors might just have to create worthwhile sites.
Understand, this isn't a gripe I have with you, Cleo. I think you're wonderful (the Queen of Porn, as it says on my site). I just have strong feelings about this and, should any sponsors care, I would love to expound my theories on icq
2004-05-13, 07:30 PM
Threaded Mode