Proposed new rule: No wallpaper in pictures

[Cherry Picked]

Originally posted by kristian
I'm probably going to get strung up for saying so, but the "quality" of content is determined by how well it satisfies a marketer's traffic/niche. I can see Paul's POV - which, no offense, is a little funny because obviously a content producer would espouse highend content. I think considering content first is honestly a little backward. Sorry. I look at my traffic. Try and understand what they want. Then give it to them. Some want expensive playboy-style models; some want crappy, grainy pics of grannies exposing their calloused feet. As GG said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Right...feel free to stone me.

From the site-builder's perspective, you're correct. But I'm writing from the link-list owner's perspective. And if my "mature" section is full of sites with horrible content maybe I'm going to turn of some prospective bookmarkers.

Maybe other LL's are getting a better balance of sites submitted, but I'm getting disproportionate numbers of sites in the "mature" category that have the type of content I'm describing.