|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: How Should Boards Be Ranked | |||
Number of Threads |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Number of Replies |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 3.39% |
Number of Views |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
29 | 49.15% |
The Average of All Above |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
28 | 47.46% |
Voters: 59. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#18 |
They have the Internet on computers, now?
|
Well, I couldn't really vote; I don't think any of those three is the real measure of the value of a board. If boards were ranked by professionalism and usefulness, I thing GG&Jim would be at the top. When I want sound information, this is where I go.
I love the no BS policy of the "General Business Knowledge" forum. Page views are of value to the board owner as well as the posters, but I don't believe they should be the true measure of a board. Post count, as stated above, is easy to inflate; new threads are easy, RELEVANT new threads are not.
__________________
Hey, what did I do this time? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|