 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The new 2257 regulations go in effect in less than a month. My question is: What are | |||
| I’m getting out of the business. |
   
|
1 | 1.56% |
| I am feverishly trying to get my records in order. |
  
|
4 | 6.25% |
| I am beefing up my 2257 statement, but realize trying to get a model ID for every graphic on my site is impossible. |
  
|
6 | 9.38% |
| I am renouncing my citizenship to the US and moving offshore. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I am moving my company, servers, and banking offshore. |
  
|
1 | 1.56% |
| I am moving my company offshore. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| I am censoring all of my content. |
|
2 | 3.13% |
| I am doing nothing, I am doing nothing. |
|
15 | 23.44% |
| I live outside the US. This does not affect me. |
|
20 | 31.25% |
| I am hoping Bush gets out of office and this all dies down. |
|
15 | 23.44% |
| Voters: 64. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
2004-08-04, 11:39 AM
|
#22 |
|
Took the hint.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
 |
When it comes to things like banners and such, you start getting into the legal "never never land" of "paid promotional space", and are you in fact a publisher of the banner or are you merely using provided promotional materials in return for payment?
Sponsor hosted galleries are a no brainer, you are not the publisher, they are. Sponsor content would, normally, require a full model release to be used. I think that single model programs (like lightspeed, example) might be VERY hesitant to let their models real names and info loose on the net. The personal security issues and rights to privacy far outweigh the 2257 records requirements. So far I have not seen or heard about any of the great legal minds looking at it from the privacy side of things. I am sure someone has, just haven't seen it yet. The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Alex |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Threaded Mode