Skim bypass fee?

[Greenguy]

You know what I think? I think you're all fucked in the head! We're 10 minutes form the fucking fun park & you want to go home!

Sorry about that, but this thread does make me giggle a bit

1st off, back in the day when I was submitting to AL4A, I'd notice that a lot of other TGP's would have my gallery listed the next day. For the most part, my thinking was that I didn't ask them to link to me, so why no just redirect them via htaccess - which I did to LOR

AL4A & Ampland are really good examples of what not to do when "borrowing" galleries, because there are so many sites out that that just copy & paste their pages & put them online.

But, when each & every one of us started out, we did go out on the web & look for sites/galleries to list, so we're all guilty of "borrowing" links/galleries to get our sites going.

As far as the skim thing, it's actually not that bad of an idea, but it may fall into the "AVS" category as far as CC processing is concerned.

Of course, TGP2 & LinkList2 were "good ideas" as well, just that they came about 5 years too late

The only way that these ideas would work is if EVERYONE did them at the same time. I wouldn't do it, even if 90% of the Link Lists out there put it into place. Why? Because those that didn't want to pay for the access to the links would then come to me & surf them for free - more traffic for me, more traffic for my links - everyone is happy

Big TGP's probably wouldn't do it either, mostly because the big names don't have to skim & put a quality non-CJ site on line already. So if you were to do this, what's going to convince the surfer to pay to see your non-blind links when they can see Ampland's for free?