Blacklist gripes

codymc12 · 2004-10-13, 10:18 PM

Cleo,

Those two links are from submits to LL's that accept FPA's. The different colored page each has is an FPA.

Re: them looking like they are script generated - I feel that's entirely a matter of opinion. They were made by me, by hand, in Dreamweaver/Photoshop. No script stuff at all.

One of the periods I got my email banned in, I did the following sites:

http://www.daily-porn.net/babewife/
http://www.hotsexythumbs.com/toyspussy/

I actually purchased software to assist me in making logos and buttons so that I could keep myself from getting banned.

I should add that I've never had any difficulty getting listed at Cleo's, and I don't want to start having difficulty now, so... no offense meant.

And my post isn't some slam on LL's or their owners in general. I realize what we're dealing with is sheer volume. Making it hard to differentiate.

The truth is, though, my sites aren't generated by a script, I don't cheat, I don't reuse content, I don't use overused sponsor content, etc. But I still get banned. And I go through link lists, and I see sites that, to be honest, don't look like they're breaking the originality barrier either, which means it's opinion based. I think templates should be held to mean templates. I was venting on it, and I think it's something that needs some reform.

Sure, I recognize it's not likely to happen - but rather than fume about it, it was worth a post.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2004-10-13, 10:18 PM	#5
codymc12 WHO IS FONZY!?! Don't they teach you anything at school? Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 45	Cleo, Those two links are from submits to LL's that accept FPA's. The different colored page each has is an FPA. Re: them looking like they are script generated - I feel that's entirely a matter of opinion. They were made by me, by hand, in Dreamweaver/Photoshop. No script stuff at all. One of the periods I got my email banned in, I did the following sites: http://www.daily-porn.net/babewife/ http://www.hotsexythumbs.com/toyspussy/ I actually purchased software to assist me in making logos and buttons so that I could keep myself from getting banned. I should add that I've never had any difficulty getting listed at Cleo's, and I don't want to start having difficulty now, so... no offense meant. And my post isn't some slam on LL's or their owners in general. I realize what we're dealing with is sheer volume. Making it hard to differentiate. The truth is, though, my sites aren't generated by a script, I don't cheat, I don't reuse content, I don't use overused sponsor content, etc. But I still get banned. And I go through link lists, and I see sites that, to be honest, don't look like they're breaking the originality barrier either, which means it's opinion based. I think templates should be held to mean templates. I was venting on it, and I think it's something that needs some reform. Sure, I recognize it's not likely to happen - but rather than fume about it, it was worth a post.