Need help /raided and computers seized

[doublep]

Originally Posted by RawAlex

Public officials respond to the concerns of the citizens (or their own concerns and biases). We get what we get.
Alex

I think what you find in this day in age is public officials whipping up distorted concerns in their citizens... hence, I took exception at the statement you made earlier...

Paul.

[Hammer]

CP and spamming may be built in assumptions with the general public, but we definitely don't need fellow webmasters enforcing them on adult webmaster boards. When you made the comments they weren't made to point out what other people 'might' think, you said them about how you personally felt. You said you did not want to live next door to a 'whip house' and then continued to bring up children and how they would be affected.

[domweb]

Interesting note I didn't see anyone else pick up on. The cops said it was illegal to practice Sadomasochism.

So therefore, when I give my fiancee a caning because she asked for it, I am commiting a crime. When I tie her to the bed and blindfold her before fucking, I am commiting a crime.

Fuck free speech. You are talking about the freedom to smack someones ass who WANTS you too.

There is all this discussion about whether or not she is a prostitute in a residential zone and nothing about the fact that she isn't allowed, under law, to practice BDSM.

I know it's hard for someone not it the lifestyle to understand this, but there are a lot of people into the BDSM lifestyle who NEVER HAVE SEX. I had a slave for over six months and never had sex with her because she didn't do sex, only BDSM. My flogging and caning technique improved greatly, but no fuckee suckee.

I have met people who hire Dominants and HAVE NO SEXUAL CONTACT with them. I know a few pro Dommes and they have lots of no sex clients.

So don't point the finger and scream, "WHORE" because someone takes donations. I have given donations at the door to get into fetish parties in the past and never had sex with anyone at the party. Did the phrase, "innocent until proven guilty" go out with civil rights after 9/11?

I am, however, fascinated how far some people will go to justify their arguments. In all my years I have never heard anyone introduce ZONING LAWS as a trump to free speech or free expression.

As for the argument that "I don't want to be exposed to that and I don't want my kids exposed to it", makes me laugh my ass off. Anyone in the lifestyle goes OUT OF THEIR WAY to avoid exposing anyone to their play. And it's exactly because of the ignorance so blatantley expressed earlier.

Besides, if you are reading this post, YOU ARE IN THE PORN BUSINESS.

Webmaster, hooker, camgirl, whatever. Over ninety percent of porn is shot WITH HOOKERS as the performers.

Maybe you are just mad because she might be cutting in on your online sales by going direct to the customer instead of being pimped by you?

Porn Webmaster = Pimp

Accept it.

Ignorance is easy. Learning is hard.

[Tommy]

Originally Posted by domweb

I have given donations at the door to get into fetish parties in the past and never had sex with anyone at the party.

this is like arguing with republicans over the war

when you gave a donation at those party's the money went to beer, wine, liquor, pizza and wings

and when donations are taken at bdsm party's there is always a no play rule,
which means no sex

asking for a donation of 300 a hour for spankings is a little different

[Useless]

Originally Posted by domweb

Interesting note I didn't see anyone else pick up on. The cops said it was illegal to practice Sadomasochism.

I don't think that one can say that sadomasochism is wholey illegal. It doesn't make sense, like much of what she said, so I believe many of us filtered it out.

Originally Posted by domweb

I have given donations at the door to get into fetish parties in the past and never had sex with anyone at the party.

The wife and I have paid entrance fees to get into a club and did have sex with others, but not the owners (creepy old couple) so I doubt that it could be considered prostition since none of us were paid. In the Empress' situation, I'm not sure if she stated what services she was performing for the "donations" so I couldn't say if she was prostituting herself. The club that I mentioned was in a residential neighborhood. Scummy, but residential none-the-less. Would I want it next to me? No. Does that make me hypocritical? Yes, but that's just how I roll. From the outside, it didn't look any different from any other house on that block, but I wouldn't want to deal with the other things that sometimes follow explicit adult behavior.

Originally Posted by domweb

Did the phrase, "innocent until proven guilty" go out with civil rights after 9/11?

I'm penalizing your argument 5 points for that statement because you're grasping at straws. Bringing 9/11 into this discussion is almost as silly as telling the U.N. that Iraq blew up the towers.

Originally Posted by domweb

I am, however, fascinated how far some people will go to justify their arguments. In all my years I have never heard anyone introduce ZONING LAWS as a trump to free speech or free expression.

A lot of laws trump free expression. Zoning laws managed to get Cindy Sheehan arrested while attempting to deliver petitions to the White House the other day.

Originally Posted by domweb

As for the argument that "I don't want to be exposed to that and I don't want my kids exposed to it", makes me laugh my ass off. Anyone in the lifestyle goes OUT OF THEIR WAY to avoid exposing anyone to their play. And it's exactly because of the ignorance so blatantley expressed earlier.

I don't personally fear my kids being exposed - for the very reason you mentioned - discretion. But, shit happens and shit brings trouble to a community. It only takes one pissed off or jealous person creating waves and suddenly you have a lot of explaining to do.

Originally Posted by domweb

Webmaster, hooker, camgirl, whatever. Over ninety percent of porn is shot WITH HOOKERS as the performers.

That's simply not true.

Originally Posted by domweb

Maybe you are just mad because she might be cutting in on your online sales by going direct to the customer instead of being pimped by you?

Makes no sense what so ever.

Originally Posted by domweb

Porn Webmaster = Pimp

Accept it.

Not by any realistic definition. Pimps sell pussy. We sell pics of pussy.

I understand how you've become offended by this thread, I truly do. But I don't think anyone is attacking the S&M community. I can't imagine why anyone would. Sure, we've been stating that the person in question was acting pretty damned foolishly by advertising her services online, but that was pretty nuts. You and I, though from different sexual lifestyles, understand the need for discretion. She fucked up. She wasn't being discreet enough. If she had been discreet, this thread wouldn't be here right now.

[docholly]

very interesting thread...not necessarily the post that started it.. but then ensuing debate.

I found this extremely amusing:

Webmaster, hooker, camgirl, whatever. Over ninety percent of porn is shot WITH HOOKERS as the performers.

Can you tell me where? Because my step-daughter is an "escort" which is an upscale term for hooker and can always use the extra exposure...




*holly is a camwhore and proud of it*

[domweb]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I understand how you've become offended by this thread, I truly do.

Actually, UW...I am not offended. Realy. More like very amused.

I meant no previous insults to hookers, by the way! I like hookers! I like escorts! I have never used them, but I think they are darn nifty things to have around.

I'll respond to the flood my comment unleashed later when I have had more sleep.

But, I am not offended.

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

I'm penalizing your argument 5 points for that statement because you're grasping at straws. Bringing 9/11 into this discussion is almost as silly as telling the U.N. that Iraq blew up the towers.

Aw...COME ON! Someone brought up pedophilia! I get to make a reference to 9/11! Next we'll bring up Nazi's!

[furrygirl]

Originally Posted by domweb

There is all this discussion about whether or not she is a prostitute in a residential zone and nothing about the fact that she isn't allowed, under law, to practice BDSM.

Maybe you are just mad because she might be cutting in on your online sales by going direct to the customer instead of being pimped by you?

Actually, I tried both of those arguments earlier, but people don't really like reading my posts.

[Clare]

I was busted for doing domme/sub sessions out of my apartment a few years ago. After that I completely got out of doing sessions as i never wanted to go thru plain clothes cops storming into my place and terrifying me again. It was my first offense and I got off with a low level misdemeanor. What it came down to was although there was no actual exchange of sex I was not zoned/liscensed for nudity for $.
I suspect Empress M's neighbors may have caught on to what she was doing due to simple traffic. God knows the last thing any of my clients would ever have wanted to do was bother a kid or draw attention to themselves in any way, but doing this in a residense catches up to a lot of people. The fact that no arrest was made seems to me that they really can't prove any kind of sex or even nudity for money or that they were trying to get her on obscenity with her sites but then wouldn't it have to have been federal cops. Maybe the whole thing is just to run he rout of town, and use her materials to find out if she is connceted to any kind of larger sex ring. Or maybe just a local hard on for incall hookers. Anyway , I don't know if she feels confident enough to post on this board anymore but I would liek to hear how things come out. Of course get a lawyer, FSC can reccommend great ones and after her experience I am sure she'll reconsider working independently ever again. From what i see on her sites she has taken the donation info down, probably a good move.

[koalat]

Granted I'm pretty new at this whole adult webmaster thing, but in my overall experience I've never seen people in trouble with law enforcement officials who weren't doing anything wrong.

Cops usually have better things to do than give trouble to tax paying, law abiding citizens who are minding their business.

I guess donations for services like that wouldn't exactly be reported on a tax return though. Tax reasons are probably one of the biggest areas that would attract the attention of the authorities...

[walrus]

Originally Posted by koalat

Granted I'm pretty new at this whole adult webmaster thing, but in my overall experience I've never seen people in trouble with law enforcement officials who weren't doing anything wrong.

Cops usually have better things to do than give trouble to tax paying, law abiding citizens who are minding their business.

I guess donations for services like that wouldn't exactly be reported on a tax return though. Tax reasons are probably one of the biggest areas that would attract the attention of the authorities...

Wish I could say the same thing! Even though I have never gotten more than a speeding ticket or two, let alone be arrested for any type of illegal activity, I have had my apartment searched at least six times in the last 5 years and my car / bike searched more time than I can remember.

Why?! Probably because I do ride a bike, have long hair and look like your prototypical biker. Mind you I fly no colors or belong to any affiliations (except porn).

Quite simply, I'm just a big ugly fucker, with long hair and a beard, who rides a bike but that's enough to warrant police attention even when I'm sitting at home in my skivvies posting porn on my blogs.

[furrygirl]

Originally Posted by koalat

Granted I'm pretty new at this whole adult webmaster thing, but in my overall experience I've never seen people in trouble with law enforcement officials who weren't doing anything wrong.

Stick around a few months. Or read up on the history of the smut business in America.

[doublep]

Alex, do excuse me, I obviously misunderstood this:

"Does the 1st amendment give her the right to lower the living standards of her neighbourhood? Does it give her the right potentially expose her chosen lifestyle to children around that area? To bring people into the neighbourhood that might find children tasty? Think hard."

I thought that was a point *you* were making in regards to the women's activities - you did ask us to think hard!

Paul.

[RawAlex]

Originally Posted by doublep

Alex, do excuse me, I obviously misunderstood this:

"Does the 1st amendment give her the right to lower the living standards of her neighbourhood? Does it give her the right potentially expose her chosen lifestyle to children around that area? To bring people into the neighbourhood that might find children tasty? Think hard."

I thought that was a point *you* were making in regards to the women's activities - you did ask us to think hard!

Paul.

Paul, you have to always look at things from the standpoint of "how will it get played in the media:. Without a doubt, the issue of protecting children (which is what the DoJ and Bush claim they are trying to do with 2257) will come up the deal.

THe other thing to remember is that rights cannot be construed in a vacuum. The right to have a dungeon and to run a commercial "whipping for hire" busijness has to be balanced against the rights of the neighbors to lead normal lives and such. It's a give and take, no doubt.

I really do have a feeling that if this is a true occurance, then the local officials have set up a nice harrassment deal to "get those perverts out of town".



Alex

[webwoman]

I'm in a business district. Not residential i have 4 businesses ajacent to my home and i'm smack in the middle. A car dealership is in my back yard 3 stores a strip mall.
up the street is a porn shop and a head shop further down .i also have a rug company
and dunkin donuts right here in my back yard ..what the hell are you saying ..half of my dam house was zoned a business. for that matter the whole thing could be if i wanted it to ...but because i live in it its half and half...get the facts not hear say please.

[doublep]

Hi Jeremy As Woodward say's, there is a lot of stigma against the S&M community in the UK, hence publishers move their operations outside of the UK legal jurisdiction and opt for delivering their products electronically - this suits them and their consumers, who find it safer to download, keeping the prying eyes of customs at bay. This brings me back to my original point, this makes it harder for the authorities to catch publishers and consumers at home - so they go after soft targets just like webwomen. As I said, these guys have to justify their wages somehow. Kicking down doors mob handed offers that.

Alex - on the issue of location, webwomen has said that she is in a business zone. On the issue of the media and how it would be played out, you are preaching to the choir - I know exactly how they play it out - what I don't expect to see is an adult webmaster using some of their lame reactionary scare mongering tactics on an adult board - it sure came across that way.

Wazza - the population of the UK are getting spanked in lots of ways mate ;-)

[RawAlex]

doublep, sorry, this is the first she has said about being in a buisness zone. The rest of the time she talks about "in her house" and special permits and whatnot. Until her post just now. honestly, I assumed it was the basement of her house. Nothing else to work from.

My comments aren't scare mongering in the slightest. It is just putting into play the reality of what people face. Most of us don't get hassled because we don't run commercially visible businesses, and most of us don't deal directly in providing physical services of (potentially) sexual nature to end clients. I have never had a surfer in my office (except possibly some of my friends, but I don't ask), and they certainly are not getting any physical services for money here.

Sex related activites + visitors + cash = prostitution in most "straight" people's minds. Most straight people also consider (incorrectly, from my understanding) that S&M / BDSM / domination is a sexual act. Therefore, they see prostitution as the end result. Getting someone to show up with cash in hand asking for a session during the raid is a nice classic touch.

Webwoman, I would "get the facts" except that you have been very, very, very soft on them. Let me start at the top:

"my home was raided by the local and state police"
"The town that i live in approved my home based internet adult business along with a studio that i shoot content and video for my site"
"imagine having to park your car in the front of a house thats being raided with 30 police cars a hugh forensic van parked in my driveway"
"When they did not find what they were looking for they decided to take my 4 computers cameras all my business files and both rooms of furniture that we use for our shoots"

I am using your words as presented.

What I am starting to see here is a story that is changing and morphing, and starting to make me think that we truly don't have anything like the whole story here.

Alex

[RawAlex]

Let me add this into the discussion... information taken from a public record of the registration of the domain(s) in question:

http://maps.google.com/maps?q=5+mont...&iwloc=A&hl=en

Looks to me like a residential street, next to a commercial street. Yup, car dealer in the back yard, but the neighbor to the side has a nice swimming pool in the back yard.

The point for me is that I am not wrong. This is a residential street, one of the two ways into a nice little subdivision. Yes, one side is commercial... but the other side isn't.

I should also point out that the domain for this "business" is less than 6 months old. The business is what? Well, here goes:

"We have two areas that I conduct my sessions in my fully equipped Dungeon or my medical fetish room. Both are private.

I am available for sessions Monday thru Friday 11am to 11pm Sat –Sun Noon to 8pm
Weekend sessions must be booked by Friday.
Remember to book early, this ensures that you get the desired time you want.

Tribute for my session is $300
Half day -$500
Full day -$700
Overnight -$1000
Please leave a message with contact information if you want me to call you back.
Contact me at XXXXXXX email me at XXXXXXXXXXX"

There is much more to this story than meets the eye.

Alex

[DJilla]

Oh, yeah if the State Police was involved too.. you are really screwed because that means the State Attorney General's Office had to sign off on the effort. Settle it fast and shut up! What kind of moron in a criminal prosecution goes on a public board and bitches. You are STUPID.

[Jim]

I know someone around here that is basically doing the same thing. I called them yesterday to kind of warn them and they told me that they were making about $5k/week from the "donations". I told them to put about half of that away for their legal fund The people I know are really doing worse than spanking and bondage but, I felt like I was just talking to myself when I warned them what could happen. To top it off, their donation website is on tripod.

[Beaver Bob]

Originally Posted by Jim

To top it off, their donation website is on tripod.

you'd think with $5,000 a week in donations you could afford some decent hosting

[Jim]

Originally Posted by Beaver Bob

you'd think with $5,000 a week in donations you could afford some decent hosting

When they started, they had nothing so went with tripod. Now that they are doing well, they have links on all the escort sites and they don't get that you can just redirect the traffic.

[selena]

I really need to put in my ball gag, because there is oh so much I would say if I don't.

[Tommy]

Originally Posted by selena

I really need to put in my ball gag, because there is oh so much I would say if I don't.

I would be interested in hearing your side of it

your supposed to participate in board discussions or are you to busy to be bothered now that you got your new cushy job

Originally Posted by domweb

And it's exactly because of the ignorance so blatantley expressed earlier.

Besides, if you are reading this post, YOU ARE IN THE PORN BUSINESS.

Webmaster, hooker, camgirl, whatever. Over ninety percent of porn is shot WITH HOOKERS as the performers.

Maybe you are just mad because she might be cutting in on your online sales by going direct to the customer instead of being pimped by you?

Porn Webmaster = Pimp

Accept it.

don't be so quick to be lumping us in with hookers and on top of that, hookers that practice their trade in areas that aren't properly zoned for it

[selena]

Originally Posted by Tommy

I would be interested in hearing your side of it

your supposed to participate in board discussions or are you to busy to be bothered now that you got your new cushy job

You got that right. I am too cozy in my lap of luxury.

Seriously, I see points to both sides of things, really.

It just seemed to me that there was a very anti-BDSM theme to some of the posts. It could be that I read more into it than what was there.