2257 or .xxx which will it be? - Page 2

pornofreekman · 2005-06-06, 06:46 PM

LEGITIMIZE PORN ?????
Rupert Murdoch ( owner of Fox News ..etc ) makes more money off of porn ( pay per view movies...etc ) than Hustler and Playboy do !!! He is W's mouth in the press. The "Radcons" will NOT have a war on porn, they make too much $$$off of porn. The current administration is just doing lip service to the hardcore christian conservatives is all. we can still do .com with porn but it will make a red light district and probably get less hassles in the future. I guess I will do both and see what expliots I can get in the .xxx side.

LindaMight · 2005-06-07, 09:47 AM

If anything at all gets rid of child porn on the internet, I am all for it. As far as kids viewing porn...that isn't the point of 2257 supposedly.

Regarding 2257, and the supposedly "real" reason it exists...policing child porn....well it is more than obvious that me and anyone who might ever be on my site, is middle aged. Thousands of pictures I can keep a record of, because it is basically just me and George....but webcam will not exist for me as I refuse to keep copies and documents regarding any shows...... so screw it.

When I think about it, I do have a legitimate incorporated company and everything that relates to my site is done via the corporation, so DOT COM is truly where my site extension should be. For those that do this as an individual, without any true company structure...then xxx is probably the most logical extension.

Linda

She who changed to Democrat when the world became bushwhacked.

View Poll Results: Heavy 2257 enforcement or .xxx -- which would you rather deal with?
2257	13	35.14%
.xxx	24	64.86%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

2005-06-07, 09:47 AM	#2
LindaMight Oh! I haven't changed since high school and suddenly I am uncool Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Up there and down here Posts: 258	If anything at all gets rid of child porn on the internet, I am all for it. As far as kids viewing porn...that isn't the point of 2257 supposedly. Regarding 2257, and the supposedly "real" reason it exists...policing child porn....well it is more than obvious that me and anyone who might ever be on my site, is middle aged. Thousands of pictures I can keep a record of, because it is basically just me and George....but webcam will not exist for me as I refuse to keep copies and documents regarding any shows...... so screw it. When I think about it, I do have a legitimate incorporated company and everything that relates to my site is done via the corporation, so DOT COM is truly where my site extension should be. For those that do this as an individual, without any true company structure...then xxx is probably the most logical extension. Linda She who changed to Democrat when the world became bushwhacked. __________________ The Woman with a Surprise

2005-06-06, 06:46 PM	#1
pornofreekman A woman is like beer. They look good, they smell good, and you'd step over your own mother just to get one! Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: in da house Posts: 50	LEGITIMIZE PORN ????? Rupert Murdoch ( owner of Fox News ..etc ) makes more money off of porn ( pay per view movies...etc ) than Hustler and Playboy do !!! He is W's mouth in the press. The "Radcons" will NOT have a war on porn, they make too much $$$off of porn. The current administration is just doing lip service to the hardcore christian conservatives is all. we can still do .com with porn but it will make a red light district and probably get less hassles in the future. I guess I will do both and see what expliots I can get in the .xxx side.