Bizarre site of the day - Page 4

furrygirl · 2005-11-29, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Surfn

I promote her. She evens submits galleries to me when she feels like it

Indeed I do. Between running 3 paysites and a store, I don't have time to make more than 1 or 2 TGP galleries a month, it's mainly my affiliates that do the TGP work.

So Surfn, as long as we're on the thread, are you going to allow period galleries on your TGP?

Chop Smith · 2005-11-29, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furrygirl

...So Surfn, as long as we're on the thread, are you going to allow period galleries on your TGP?

I am curious as to what paysite would you promote with period galleries.

Surfn · 2005-11-30, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furrygirl

Indeed I do. Between running 3 paysites and a store, I don't have time to make more than 1 or 2 TGP galleries a month, it's mainly my affiliates that do the TGP work.

So Surfn, as long as we're on the thread, are you going to allow period galleries on your TGP?

I'd be happy to if I had the category

Linkster · 2005-11-30, 05:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furrygirl

So Surfn, as long as we're on the thread, are you going to allow period galleries on your TGP?

I would list free sites in my general fetish category

furrygirl · 2005-11-30, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chop Smith

I am curious as to what paysite would you promote with period galleries.

Erotic Red, as soon as I get it all sorted out. I actually finally might have found a biller who jives with blood content *and* I don't have to incorporate in the EU to use, so hopefully soon.

Surfn: You surely have an "amateur" or "fetish" category, don't you? My aim with the site is not to hype menstruation as a super-freaky out-there thing, so I'm not primarily after "extreme fetish"-type categories for submissions.

Linkster: First, I had never noticed that you had a safer sex page, that's a very cool addition!

I don't know if I'll ever get into free sites, since I see them as generally just ugly internet clutter with too many ads, but maybe I'll do something creative at some point.

Chop Smith · 2005-11-30, 07:06 PM

I truly hope to you get your billing worked out.

You are wrong about free sites. Nothing wrong with making them look better that the masses. Besides, the quality of traffic to your target is much more productive. Now if you are trying to expand your traffic ego, stay with galleries.

furrygirl · 2005-11-30, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chop Smith

I truly hope to you get your billing worked out.

You are wrong about free sites. Nothing wrong with making them look better that the masses. Besides, the quality of traffic to your target is much more productive. Now if you are trying to expand your traffic ego, stay with galleries.

Oh, I don't doubt that people *can* make unique and profitable free sites besides a messy-as-hell ad-filled page with "gallery 1" and "gallery 2" links. The few ideas I have for free sites would actually involve some time or shooting special content for them, since I do my best to not make things I consider to be tacky net clutter.

emmanuelle · 2005-11-30, 08:17 PM

While I don't do free sites, I imagine that they're like any other genre in this business. Some are nicely done, others are not. Also, much like galleries or paysites; the prettiest ones may not always be the best sellers.

Linkster · 2005-11-30, 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furrygirl

Linkster: First, I had never noticed that you had a safer sex page, that's a very cool addition!

I don't know if I'll ever get into free sites, since I see them as generally just ugly internet clutter with too many ads, but maybe I'll do something creative at some point.

Ive had that page up for at least 3 years that I can remember

Actually need to update it as a bunch of those sites have taken down their stuff and replaced it with advertising

As far as free sites - there should not be any ad clutter on the sites that get accepted by Linklists - most have a rule about how many ads/links per page and are limited to 3 normally - and they are extremely targetted traffic sources.
A normal comparison for you would be that a gallery would expect to convert about 1:1200 to 1:5000 dependant on the type of TGP its listed on (thats clicks sent to the sponsor) while a free site on a link list that has good sources of SE traffic should convert in the 1:50 to 1:800 range (normally)
Would seem to me in my experience that the cost benefit analysis norms would show free sites as a much superior option - I know the sponsors that have really delved into the hosted free site game have increased revenues substantially

2005-11-30, 07:06 PM	#81
Chop Smith Eighteen 'til I Die Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Mississippi Posts: 2,168	I truly hope to you get your billing worked out. You are wrong about free sites. Nothing wrong with making them look better that the masses. Besides, the quality of traffic to your target is much more productive. Now if you are trying to expand your traffic ego, stay with galleries. __________________

2005-11-30, 08:17 PM	#83
emmanuelle 0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011 Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Montreal Posts: 1,441	While I don't do free sites, I imagine that they're like any other genre in this business. Some are nicely done, others are not. Also, much like galleries or paysites; the prettiest ones may not always be the best sellers.