What Pisses You Off With Link Lists & Free Sites?

[stfuvt]

Originally Posted by tigermom

Thank you for this thread, GG. I'm not sure where this is going, but always nice to vent a little

Well, most of it has been covered, but here are my pet peeves -

1. The 24 hours thing - I am all for a window. Even though I take long breaks from submitting, I would still like to be able to submit regularly when I do submit.

2. The annoying image verification thingies - I don't mind them there, just make them either all numbers or all letters (no caps), or whatever. Anything that won't make me try 3 times before I can get a submit through.

3. Category recips - especially where you have hundreds of categories to choose from and it gets very difficult to decide on the exact one. Then when you submit, you have to check which recip it was that you put in, otherwise you're not submitting to the right category of black lesbians with big natural boobs pictures or something.

4. Too many fields in the submit form - keeping them simple with url-title-description works best for me.

5. Demanding too much hardcore/explicit pics on a FS. I agree that if a FS is about bj's, it needs to actually show the bj, but I think allowing us a better ratio of tease to hardcore everyone could benefit.

Things I like -

1. Submitter accounts, where I can log in once and stay logged in. Saves on filling in the username/email. Also, if it gets my sites listed faster, all the better for it. I think it may help the reviewers as well, working with trusted submitters. As suggested before, maybe make things a bit more flexible for trusted submitters, such as allow frames and JS for dynamic ads to sponsors.

2. LL owners that make themselves available for communication, either via emails or on the board here. I think Greenie is a great example for that, and not just because he runs this place. He's always available via PM's as well. I hate it when I can't get through to ask a question.

thats awesome post with all the things I can think of,
but Link O Rama is one of the best LLs, because you send acceptance, rejection emails fast, don`t have backlog, so the submitter knows where he stands and the fast communication is a must have and you have it
Awesome job

[Simon]

Originally Posted by xxxjay

I don't think the question should be so much what pisses me off...it is what is pissing the surfer off. Personally, I love all of the extra exposure to advertising that you get from a freesite vs. a tgp gallery.

A lot of surfers that grew up on TGPs may not have any tollerance for this.

I think that's something that doesn't get discussed enough (at least in public). While I like the link list paradigm, where the surfer is exposed to more advertising on the free site pages in order to view the porn pics/vids, I do think that this design is clearly more for the benefit of those trying to make sales, and not the benefit of the surfers.

Yes, I know that all the Good (white hat) link list owners are very concerned about taking care of the surfers, and do a lot to keep their own sites, and the free sites to which they link, as free from anything malicious as possible. We all know that loyal bookmarkers are valuable and we don't want to do anything to chase them away.

I'm wondering though...are we really doing enough to interest and keep them in the first place? Sure, a nice clean link list with tons of links to free porn is worth bookmarking for many surfers. But once surfers are aware of the variety of ways they can get to the porn of their choice, is the link list really going to be their 'favorite' place anymore?

Personally, I don't look for porn on link lists, and here's why: Too many damn clicks to get to the first pic in a series, or the first video clip.

Starting from when the surfer first decides he wants to look at some porn, he may need to hit the link list's warning page, then a main page, maybe then a category page and maybe a sub-niche from that page, then find a description that sounds like it might be something he'd like to see, then click that link, then another warning page with another search for the enter link, then a main page, then find the link to gallery one (not always easy) and click that link, and ...

...and yes, finally there --- and finally get to see that not only is this action sequence not exactly what he wanted to see, but the people in the pics aren't very interesting-looking to his particular taste or interests at the moment.

Sure, all he need to do at that point is go back to the link list page and try his luck again at picking a description that sounds like it just might lead to something he wants to see. Kind of like some weird form of porn gambling with the house stacking the odds against him though. But who knows, maybe the link list design is really for the porn surfers who love to gamble?

Either way, he's at least 5 pages/clicks from porn at the start, or maybe more if he goes through sub-category pages first.

Then, once he knows he's not interested in the pics in the first gallery, he may need to back out to the link list, which is another 3 back button clicks, or maybe he can close the free site gallery page and be back on the link list page. Either way, he's still at least 4 pages/clicks away from knowing if he's looking at porn he's interested again.

I think that whether a surfer grew up on TGP sites or not, many of them will have favorite places where they know they can easily, and with as few steps as possible, get to the specific kind of porn they're interested in seeing at the moment. And for some, that will mean the link list and free sites. But I think there are a lot of surfers who choose to hit TGP/MGP sites because they get a look at the action and the people involved in it before they waste another long sequence of clicks to take their first look again.

I don't have the solution to this (or maybe I just don't want to talk about it yet), but I think we have to come up with some ways to keep the surfer interested in all the clicks required if we want more of them to come back and play our game again day after day. Almost anyone can make money off the AOL-newbie traffic, but selling porn to the growing audience of surfers who've been on the Net awhile is another story.

Time for more coffee. Sorry about the long post if you didn't find it interesting.

[johnnybg]

Originally Posted by Simon

I don't have the solution to this (or maybe I just don't want to talk about it yet), but I think we have to come up with some ways to keep the surfer interested in all the clicks required if we want more of them to come back and play our game again day after day. Almost anyone can make money off the AOL-newbie traffic, but selling porn to the growing audience of surfers who've been on the Net awhile is another story.

As usual, Simon has several great points in his post.

I believe that this thread might be about "rules that piss us off" or "recips gathering nightmare". But, it also might be about realization that LL/TGP model is somewhat outdated.

Before I go hide behind the couch, let me give you some of my points:
1. LL/TGP model is what? 10-15 years old?
2. Advertising on LLs/TGPs/FSs/Galleries is of the same age. (banners, text links)

I believe that LLs have to "speed up" selling porn. Surfers are used to quick navigation (social bookmarks, rss feeds, tags, personalization)

I tried to experiment a bit with my hub, added voting, commenting and tagging. What I saw from my (still young) experiment, people use tags a lot more than categories links. They also love to click on tag cloud thing. That might be an idea for link lists. Maybe Useless Warrior has some more valid input on this.

Other idea is to, instead of recips, we use Digg-style buttons for voting on free sites. For example, surfer might want to bookmark my free site on Link-o-Rama and clicks on [Add to Linkorama] button. Then he/she gets back to LOR, looks at bookmarked sites, etc.

Also, a RSS feed with newest free sites listed at LLs, with LLs own advertising might be good for bottom lines.

[xxxjay]

Originally Posted by Simon

I think that's something that doesn't get discussed enough (at least in public). While I like the link list paradigm, where the surfer is exposed to more advertising on the free site pages in order to view the porn pics/vids, I do think that this design is clearly more for the benefit of those trying to make sales, and not the benefit of the surfers.

Yes, I know that all the Good (white hat) link list owners are very concerned about taking care of the surfers, and do a lot to keep their own sites, and the free sites to which they link, as free from anything malicious as possible. We all know that loyal bookmarkers are valuable and we don't want to do anything to chase them away.

I'm wondering though...are we really doing enough to interest and keep them in the first place? Sure, a nice clean link list with tons of links to free porn is worth bookmarking for many surfers. But once surfers are aware of the variety of ways they can get to the porn of their choice, is the link list really going to be their 'favorite' place anymore?

Personally, I don't look for porn on link lists, and here's why: Too many damn clicks to get to the first pic in a series, or the first video clip.

Starting from when the surfer first decides he wants to look at some porn, he may need to hit the link list's warning page, then a main page, maybe then a category page and maybe a sub-niche from that page, then find a description that sounds like it might be something he'd like to see, then click that link, then another warning page with another search for the enter link, then a main page, then find the link to gallery one (not always easy) and click that link, and ...

...and yes, finally there --- and finally get to see that not only is this action sequence not exactly what he wanted to see, but the people in the pics aren't very interesting-looking to his particular taste or interests at the moment.

Sure, all he need to do at that point is go back to the link list page and try his luck again at picking a description that sounds like it just might lead to something he wants to see. Kind of like some weird form of porn gambling with the house stacking the odds against him though. But who knows, maybe the link list design is really for the porn surfers who love to gamble?

Either way, he's at least 5 pages/clicks from porn at the start, or maybe more if he goes through sub-category pages first.

Then, once he knows he's not interested in the pics in the first gallery, he may need to back out to the link list, which is another 3 back button clicks, or maybe he can close the free site gallery page and be back on the link list page. Either way, he's still at least 4 pages/clicks away from knowing if he's looking at porn he's interested again.

I think that whether a surfer grew up on TGP sites or not, many of them will have favorite places where they know they can easily, and with as few steps as possible, get to the specific kind of porn they're interested in seeing at the moment. And for some, that will mean the link list and free sites. But I think there are a lot of surfers who choose to hit TGP/MGP sites because they get a look at the action and the people involved in it before they waste another long sequence of clicks to take their first look again.

I don't have the solution to this (or maybe I just don't want to talk about it yet), but I think we have to come up with some ways to keep the surfer interested in all the clicks required if we want more of them to come back and play our game again day after day. Almost anyone can make money off the AOL-newbie traffic, but selling porn to the growing audience of surfers who've been on the Net awhile is another story.

Time for more coffee. Sorry about the long post if you didn't find it interesting.

I tried to inovate the linklist some, but nobody really bit on it:

http://www.xxxpornmovielinks.com

What's different?

1. Everything is thumbed but still uses the freesite format, so it seemed more familiar to the tgp surfer:

http://www.xxxpornmovielinks.com/lin...re_movies.html (it seemed webmasters were too lazy to crop a thumb)

2. The category page link directly to the "menu" pages of each site:

http://www.xxxpornmovielinks.com/ind...es.html&next=1 (thus bringing down the number of clicks to see the content)

3. The warning pages were still linked from the "details" pages:
http://www.xxxpornmovielinks.com/details/4643/ (so the warning pages were getting linkbacks and SE benifit)

I thought it was a good go-between hybrid for surfers and submitters, but (for the most part) people slept on it.

As much as I had to say it, I've never seen a crowd that fears inovation more than the linklist crown. What worked in 1999 is not going to keep working in 2009, even as much as we'd like it to.

I'm really happy Greenguy got this thread going...it's the best thread that had been on GG&J for some time.

[Porn Junkie]

i'm going to have to agree that the die hard 24hr rule is frustrating. I got all my submit sites ready to submit as I type this but have to wait another 30 minutes before I can click submit and I want to go to bed. ... arg

[Jel]

OK so I got one

Title of today's freesite: Amateur Interracial Lesbians - Of the 20 LLs I sub to, that title was too long for two of them. One I changed the title in the form to Amateur Interacial Lesbos (script auto-chopped the title), hopefully the reviewer will accept that as being close enough to the on-page title. The other stated no more than x amount of characters, but the sub went through with the original title so guessing that's a request rather than a set-in-stone rule.

A little thing, but enough to bug you when you have subbed to half the LLs and can't change the on page title

[LowryBigwood]

I have another, more of a rant really.

When LL owners deny your freesite for having a recip on your page that doesn't exactly match what they want you using. When in reality... that link being different from the thousands of identical ones they have forced others to use is probably helping and not hurting the site. Go figure..

[Lemmy]

After thinking about it some, this thread is starting to scare me. Seems most of us are pissed at pretty much the same things and some of the solutions that have been mentioned are centralized submit sites where you can grab premade recip tables and submit to many sites with one click, more uniform rules etc etc.

I thought some of the beauty of the LL/freesite model was variety, but these suggestions would do the opposite and create more uniformity.

And how much trouble is it to grab the correct micro-micro-niche recip? Most of us probably submit to 4-5 categories at most on a regular basis. Grab the recip once and your done.

As for the 24-hour rule that many have, that's easy too. If you submit every day just push your schedule ahead by one minute the next day and you're good to go. You can submit daily for a long time without having to take a day off.

If it's too much trouble to find the correct recip on the 50 or so LLs that are worth submitting to (I inflated that number so my sites might be included) and managing your time, well, they're always hiring at Wal-Mart and McDonalds. It pays about the same as a mid-level adult webmaster and the hours are much better.

[ponygirl]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

After thinking about it some, this thread is starting to scare me. Seems most of us are pissed at pretty much the same things and some of the solutions that have been mentioned are centralized submit sites where you can grab premade recip tables and submit to many sites with one click, more uniform rules etc etc.

I thought some of the beauty of the LL/freesite model was variety, but these suggestions would do the opposite and create more uniformity.

I have to agree with you here, I don't think it does any good to have everyone the same, and some of my gripes - longer titles, more flexibility with links out etc. are because I'd like to be able to add more variety to my own sites. With a more flexible freesite model, it would be easier to change templates around, make things look different and try new things in terms of visuals and marketing.

Originally Posted by Lemmy

And how much trouble is it to grab the correct micro-micro-niche recip? Most of us probably submit to 4-5 categories at most on a regular basis. Grab the recip once and your done.

As for the 24-hour rule that many have, that's easy too. If you submit every day just push your schedule ahead by one minute the next day and you're good to go. You can submit daily for a long time without having to take a day off.

If it's too much trouble to find the correct recip on the 50 or so LLs that are worth submitting to (I inflated that number so my sites might be included) and managing your time, well, they're always hiring at Wal-Mart and McDonalds. It pays about the same as a mid-level adult webmaster and the hours are much better.

and here too. Really, the recip thing kind of bugs me. I'm sure my system isn't that different from most others - I have a master list of recips, both buttons & text, that I just plug on the page & arrange the way I want it. Then with each submit page open in my browser I cut & paste into the form fields. Most LLs will have some notice if they've changed anything, and if it's a recip I just go in, grab it & change it on my site on the fly, adding it to the master table as well. Takes maybe 5 minutes from grabbing to re-uploading, not even. Generally, LLs aren't changing or adding recips every day, so chances are you won't have to do that all the time. And it's only the one time, once you change your master table. I did it this way even when I was subbing mirrors, and it never really bugged me that much. Maybe that's because as an LL owner as well, I realize a lot of work goes into those recips.

Having said that, I've been making some changes too, and I may be moving to non-catogorized recips anyway. But just thought I'd throw that out there, because I really don't see it as a big problem personally, and as a submitter, I really don't expect everything handed to me on a silver platter.

I hope the Linklist model will be around for a long time, I always liked surfing them better. I think it attracts a different type of surfer, one that likes the buildup and anticipation more, likes the 'story' and natural progression of the freesite. If LLs were all the same, they'd be tgps

I'll shut up now, this has all been just my opinion and my big mouth

[koalaTalex]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

If it's too much trouble to find the correct recip on the 50 or so LLs that are worth submitting to (I inflated that number so my sites might be included) and managing your time, well, they're always hiring at Wal-Mart and McDonalds. It pays about the same as a mid-level adult webmaster and the hours are much better.

This is very true!

[Allfetish]

Originally Posted by Greenie

It's a simple question that I don't think I've ever asked in public before now. I'm looking into making some changes with my Link Lists - some small, some major, some you'll never even notice. But I need feed back before I go any further.

So, what pisses you off as far as Free Sites & Link Lists?

Post about anything that's upsets you, from small things that annoy you to major problems that have you really pissed off. And, if you're angry with me, call my fat ass out! (but don't call anyone else out because I'm asking for it)

Hey Greenie,

I think most surfers these days are looking for visual previews and want to be able to find things easier so this means more tags and better on site search engines. There is a balance with this, I know because "spent" surfers won't sign up to paysites....but something should change in this regard.

For webmasters:

- The submit only 1 site a day rule. It isn't 1999 anymore. This business is not easy. If someone is willing to work hard and put in the extra work each day, if possible let them submit more sites. It would be very hard for someone to make a living doing this just by submitting one site a day.

- Whois privacy, hosting bans, etc. If I want to hide my whois, it may have more to do with privacy implications involved in giving out my personal information than if I am a scammer. What if I would be willing to give you a phone number (or ICQ) in such a case in order to verify things instead of banning?

-Unlisted rules. Frustrating. No one wants to waste their time.

-Communication. Ideally people would at least be notified each time their site was rejected, and even better why.

I know it is tough to do all this. I used to have a linkslist myself and it ended up going dead. But these are some of the issues, and solutions would should be explored.

[Allfetish]

Originally Posted by johnnybg

Didn't really wanted to elaborate, since it's been discussed in lengths on every adult webmaster board and their owners mothers boards, too.

Free content requirements for LLs and TGPs are the main contributors to overwhelming amount of free adult content. So, it's the same issue (general AND local).

I'm not counting here the forums with stolen pics and movies hosted on free image hosting and rapidshare, P2P networks, fusker sites etc. If we complain about these ruining our biz - we should look at ourselves first.

When I look at your "side", I see that if you reduce content requirements to say 10 pics and 30 secs of movies - you WILL lose bookmarkers and traffic AND income. Thats not acceptable for you and neither for me as someone who gets traffic from your site.

Noting short of all LLs lowering the bar at the same time would remotely work. And I'm not sure that would work either. I remember TGP2.

So, and I'm back to making some free sites.

I don't think LL and TGP have any of the blame anymore for too much free porn. Even though you don't want to talk about it, I think the rapidshare sites are definitely responsible for the mostly rising ratios.

Years ago I used to look at my stats and see forums sending me hundreds or even thousands of hits a day to my free sites by users linking to them themselves. Nowadays if I go on a forum and link directly to a gallery, even if it has 200 MB (!) of 1 minute clips in it -- all free -- the surfers will come on "What are you kidding? Don't post these little 1 minute clips! SPAM! SPAM!" and then soon I will get banned by the owner [you used ot be welcomed by the forum owners when you did this without going overboard]. They all expect 20 minute videos on rapidshare or megarotic now. You know things are bad when you can't even give the stuff away..... In no way are the linkslists and the TGPs responsible for this debacle anymore. As you hint, if they started going to 10 pictures per site, they would soon lose all their bookmarkers and again, they won't even be able to give the stuff away................

[tigermom]

Originally Posted by Allfetish

I don't think LL and TGP have any of the blame anymore for too much free porn. Even though you don't want to talk about it, I think the rapidshare sites are definitely responsible for the mostly rising ratios.

Years ago I used to look at my stats and see forums sending me hundreds or even thousands of hits a day to my free sites by users linking to them themselves. Nowadays if I go on a forum and link directly to a gallery, even if it has 200 MB (!) of 1 minute clips in it -- all free -- the surfers will come on "What are you kidding? Don't post these little 1 minute clips! SPAM! SPAM!" and then soon I will get banned by the owner [you used ot be welcomed by the forum owners when you did this without going overboard]. They all expect 20 minute videos on rapidshare or megarotic now. You know things are bad when you can't even give the stuff away..... In no way are the linkslists and the TGPs responsible for this debacle anymore. As you hint, if they started going to 10 pictures per site, they would soon lose all their bookmarkers and again, they won't even be able to give the stuff away................

That is sad. These forums should be reported for promoting stolen material though, IMO. I wonder if some sponsors who are being hurt by their stuff being circulated like this would ever sue.

[tigermom]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

As for the 24-hour rule that many have, that's easy too. If you submit every day just push your schedule ahead by one minute the next day and you're good to go. You can submit daily for a long time without having to take a day off.

While I agree with most of what you've said, and the general tone of your post (I don't think this should be made too easy, myself), I really don't get your one minute delay method. Submitting to 20 lists takes more than one minute, if this is your delay, you're bound to mess up on some LL's and hit the submit button too soon. One hour I can see, but one minute?

[oldbrad]

I think he means just time the submits to the ones that have a 24 hour limit. If you submit to two sites sites that both have the time limit, then just keep track of those two and submit a minute or two later.

I only submit to one with the 24 hour rule and thats greenguy's, so it's easier for me to submit. I think the midnight to midnight time frame would work way better for the generally webmaster though.

Brad

[Licker4U]

Originally Posted by oldbrad

I think the midnight to midnight time frame would work way better for the generally webmaster though.

I agree (again). If I submit at 6:00 a.m today and this afternoon have a site ready to submit tomorrow, but I have to do things in my "non-porn" life in the morning and have to leave at 6:00 a.m. I can't submit at 5:30 so I'm screwed. I submit when I get back at 10:00 a.m. then the next day I have to wait until 10:00 to start submitting. Every day it gets worse.

I hope link list owners see this thread and implement some of the ideas mentioned.

[Lemmy]

Originally Posted by tigermom

While I agree with most of what you've said, and the general tone of your post (I don't think this should be made too easy, myself), I really don't get your one minute delay method. Submitting to 20 lists takes more than one minute, if this is your delay, you're bound to mess up on some LL's and hit the submit button too soon. One hour I can see, but one minute?

Believe me it works just fine, I do it all the time. On Monday if you start submitting 12:01, start 12:02 on Tuesday. 24 hours and 1 minute will have elapsed.

If you want to be 100% certain of no overlap push your schedule ahead by 5 minutes every day. One month later you'll start your submits start at 2:30.

How many of us can say we go 30 days straight without missing a day of submission?

[LowryBigwood]

Originally Posted by Lemmy

How many of us can say we go 30 days straight without missing a day of submission?

Definetely not me.

However, I also think 1 minute is a bit much for myself. 5 minutes would probably work for me as I know submitting to 20 LL's per site each day, I can't get my site submitted to all of them in the exact same amount of time each day. However, I think that LL owners could easily set this rule to around 20 hours or even do away with the rule all together and make things a bit better.

I do not personally see a reason to set a rule on amount of subs a linklist gets (within reason). They are either quality sites or they're junk or maybe somewhere in between. You list it or you don't.

[papagmp]

target="blank" on recip and submit pages

Hell, how many browser windows do you think I need open?

[Linkster]

Originally Posted by tigermom

That is sad. These forums should be reported for promoting stolen material though, IMO. I wonder if some sponsors who are being hurt by their stuff being circulated like this would ever sue.

You would be surprised at how many sponsors are the ones posting this material - same as the old password sites where sponsors used to put up "stolen passwords" and link them to special areas of their paysites to get more conversions - heck most of the password sharing sites used to be owned by sponsors

[HarryM]

Originally Posted by papagmp

target="blank" on recip and submit pages

Hell, how many browser windows do you think I need open?

yeah for sure.. I think webmasters know how to open a new window if they want one.

[Simon]

Originally Posted by Linkster

- same as the old password sites where sponsors used to put up "stolen passwords" and link them to special areas of their paysites to get more conversions -

When did this stop working..?

[Greenguy]

I see you've all been busy while I was gone

I'll catch up on this tomorrow.....

[Ms Naughty]

I've been reading this thread with interest, wondering if I should post my thoughts (which are a bit jumbled). I've decided to jump in.

I don't make a lot of free sites anymore and when I do I find it to be a chore. I feel like I'm jumping through a lot of hoops that weren't there when I started. Yes, I remember the old days (which, for me, was in 2000) and it's hard not to get nostalgic.

I feel like the free site format has calcified, and that's a problem. There's no room for originality, for coming up with different ways to entice a surfer to buy. The strict format of four pages and only three outlinks per page means that making free sites is a "factory" process, one that suits the reviewer rather than the builder or the surfer. This, of course, reflects that the linklists have more power than the submitter.

(And I suspect this knowledge is why every man and his dog (and me) has now opened a linklist).

I have no solutions, of course. I fully understand why all the rules have evolved and the current situation with a million cheaters bombarding linklists, but I just feel the need to express a frustration at the stagnation that's occurred.

The other thing I think about is how Google's changes affect the linklist world. The reciprocal link thing is not working anymore. The idea that a single freesite might receive search engine traffic seems pie-in-the-sky sometimes. The major linklists get all the SE traffic because they're older and have built up more one-way links. So is there a new way to link and be listed that will benefit both parties? I have no idea.

Like others I don't like the hype surrounding the term "Web 2.0" but it's worth discussing where linklists and freesites fit in with blogs, social networking sites, video sharing and user-generated content.

Regina Lynn at Wired makes a really good point in this article:
http://www.wired.com/culture/lifesty.../sexdrive_0809
Porn is hamstrung when it comes to newer web technology because of two things - the 2257 laws and a desire not to lose control of copyrighted material.

All the new Web 2.0 thingies are about getting stuff for free. Some days I feel like hiding under my desk because I worry that the subscription model is old hat (it's not, of course, that why we still make money). Linklists are still about giving stuff away for free but, as has been mentioned before, it's not instant.

I'm not sure where I'm going with any of this, it's off the top of my head. I'll just post it anyway, might add something later.

[HowlingWulf]

Just a quick addition to what has already been said here. Sometimes you have a FS that matches several categories, or doesn't match any one category perfectly, so you try to pick the best fit possible. Sometimes the LL owner disagrees, which is fine, and you get the rejection: Wrong Category. Unfortunately I already gave my best guess so chances are slim my next guess will match the LL owner's thoughts. If he is willing to send a 'Recommended Category: XYZ' response with the denial that would help a ton.