Would you list a site with non-nude pics of a pornstar?

[Head Boy]

If the site contained a couple of sets of interesting pics and some chat, but no nudity - would you list it?

[ronnie]

I probably would in my softcore catagory. Long as she was sexy and wearing something sexy.

Dont know if may LL's would list non-nude.

I personally think there is something sexy with a peek or, think of whats underneath kind of thing.

ronnie

[Greenguy]

If she's in lingerie or panties, then I'd list it in those categories.

[Ramster]

Yup, lingerie would be the way to go. In pornstars or babes? No.

[Marchello]

For sure actually i really need pornstar FreeSites so you can submit them to me

[ladydesigner]

I don't take non-nude sites.

[Head Boy]

So would it help if there were a few pics with say a glimps of nipple, or a panty flash, or maybe she slipped her jeans down to show a bare bum.

[ladydesigner]

Possibly.... it just all depends on if it's a good quality set and if there's enough nudity. I look at it like this- I'm trying to sell porn not fully dressed models. Just my opinion.

[Head Boy]

Originally Posted by ladydesigner

I look at it like this- I'm trying to sell porn not fully dressed models. Just my opinion.

That's an interesting point, and one that I've been thinking about for quite a while. I'm coming to the conclusion that we aren't trying to sell porn, or we would link to the join page. What we are "selling" is the paysite tour, and it's the tour's job to sell the porn. It's a fine difference, but it could explain why text links work so well.

What do you think?

[Cleo]

Look they are in their underwear

[ronnie]

I sell fantasies. If I was selling sex, I'd be a pimp.. To me, what turns surfers on could be many things or anything. From hardcore sex to a sexy girl in skimpy clothing and everything in between. Teasing a surfer can also bring their blood up, leave them wanting more. A sexy girl in sexy clothes leaves many a fantasy in the surfers brain. Hardcore sex, whats left?

Just my two cents.

ronnie

[Kezza]

Without seeing it... I am guessing... NO

[spacemanspiff]

Yeah, I'll list em.

I wish all free content was non-nude and you had to whip out a credit card to see the naughty bits, but that ain't the way it is.

[stuveltje]

at we love free porn yep you can get listed in the softcore section, buttttttttttttt. oke there is the but it has to be one serie with the pics of the same girl and it has to be teasing somewhere

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by spacemanspiff

Yeah, I'll list em.

I wish all free content was non-nude and you had to whip out a credit card to see the naughty bits, but that ain't the way it is.

i have to say http://www.**************.com gets alot of non nudes submitted lately, i realy had my doubts about that because there is realy, no piece of tits, ass, twat, or what ever to see but the pics are in a serie and teasing, it has something i have to say, so opti the owner said yep list them

[Opti]

I don't like "non-nude" sites... that's code for young girls for pedo's

The site you showed me was a pornsite being advertised with a set of pics that didn't have any hardcore.. or much skin.. but it wasn't a non-nude teenie site.

(just wanted to clarify that... do not submit non-nude teenie sites to me or you will be blacklisted!)

[Head Boy]

I was thinking of sites like Raven Riley and Anjali. I don't have any pics of models under 18. In fact my personal preferences are hairy and fetish, and most of the people in those seem to be 30+. I guess the best answer is to actually do some work and ask for opinions on the results.

[Opti]

Originally Posted by Head Boy

I was thinking of sites like Raven Riley and Anjali. I don't have any pics of models under 18. In fact my personal preferences are hairy and fetish, and most of the people in those seem to be 30+. I guess the best answer is to actually do some work and ask for opinions on the results.

Sorry if i sounded like I was addresing you headboy.. I was replying to Stu's post really.


I like your site and agree with your thinking re: use the tease to sell the porn.


PS for Stuveltje... I don't think all softcore pic sets should go into the softcore category btw. If it's a softcore set advertising a panty sponsor it can go there.. and if it's a good site with lots of "tease" factor I can't see why it can't go in one of the more regular cats like Amateur or Boobs of Mature etc.. Not much use having a hardcore sponsor site shown to people surfing the softcore category inho.

[Head Boy]

That's OK - I'm with you on the non-nude pedo stuff. It's the sort of thing that the anti-porn brigade latch onto, and it messes things up for all of us. I tried running a teen tgp for a while and got pissed off because the thumbs that got the most clicks were the ones with girls that weren't wearing make-up and stuff like that.

[stuveltje]

Originally Posted by Opti

Sorry if i sounded like I was addresing you headboy.. I was replying to Stu's post really.


I like your site and agree with your thinking re: use the tease to sell the porn.


PS for Stuveltje... I don't think all softcore pic sets should go into the softcore category btw. If it's a softcore set advertising a panty sponsor it can go there.. and if it's a good site with lots of "tease" factor I can't see why it can't go in one of the more regular cats like Amateur or Boobs of Mature etc.. Not much use having a hardcore sponsor site shown to people surfing the softcore category inho.

yeap i agree and some i put also in other categories, but without any skin it still stays very softcore

[Rocco]

I list them as long all other rules aren't beeing violated.