![]() |
Quote:
|
You could have posted his ratios without the actual dollar amounts.
|
Mayor
Getting back on track and not mentioning the "posting of personal information" thing, some people have real problems using epassporte. Just because you want to work with them doesn't mean everyone else does. Why would you punish these people with a $5/check penalty? |
?!? That's absurd but I'll happily re-post minus the dollar amount but the amount of traffic divided by the ratio multiplied by our average payout will give that anyway. Not posting his traffic would lead a person to believe that perhaps I was not giving the whole picture or his traffic was way down the last 3 months when it was STABLE. Either way, I am not going to post his numbers. Fact is he lied and I'll leave it at that.
His comments were a blatant lie and I wanted to defend my company. We work our asses off to make sure we have the best converting sites around period. You can see the pride we take in that when you go to Mayor's Money and brag that YOU even found we convert better than any other program. I took it personally. I always do, because I pour everything into this company to make it what it is and when someone whom I've gone out of my way to take care of takes a cheap shot I get angry. I am sure you would too judging by the comment about pulling our links. Sad that you'd take the side of a newb liar over someone you've been doing business with since 1997. |
Quote:
Didn't lie about my numbers at all...they suck. The fact that they suck less now, than they did last summer doesn't mean they don't suck. Big and tough...again, please get a grip...what I posted was far from trying to sound big and tough. It was a simple, non threatening statement of MY perception and you waltz in here, post my personal stats and proceed to call me a liar numerous times. I was going to hit you up on ICQ to see if we could talk about this like adults before I yank my tiny amounts of traffic. Given your post, it's pretty clear you don't give a crap and would rather get into a piss fest on the board. And now I see that you've decided to call me a liar a couple more times. I'm fuckin floored here Mayor...I honestly thought you were a pretty cool guy. We've spoken a few times on ICQ...and now...THIS |banghead| Fuck it...I can't work with someone who calls me a liar in a public forum. Go ahead and give up that spot to someone else Mayor...feel fuckin free. I'll have your links down by later this evening. Oh, and yea...charge me the $5 and send a check for whatever payments are owed at this point. Of all the programs, you were about the last one I would have expected to post shit like that...and it's not just the personal stats. I take great offense to being called a liar...nothing could be farther from the truth. |
Quote:
|
I didn't know that Pimp Dawg bought Mayor's Money.
Links pulled. There goes that 259 hits per year. :D |
Funny Mr Yum, it's OK for you to say my program wasn't converting well for you in recent months but when I defend myself and proove you're lying about that I am suddenly I am the asshole? =
|
Quote:
I don't know how that company ran their office, but you might need to figure in the salary (or part of) for the employee who took care of these things. 1500 Checks per period sounds like it might keep somebody pretty busy, even if it's just dealing with papercuts from licking so many envelopes. It's my understanding that both Prodigy and Taboo check writing services charge the program $3-3.50/checks. note: Prodigy may or may not be in business still due to the cohf circumstances, and Taboo will reduce their fees based on volume The banking industry is not what it was 8 years ago. Nowadays they too punish people for paper checks with high fees. A check cashed on my business account costs me $1.75 There are genuinely good arguments for using a third party- timely payments rather than waiting on forgetful small program owners being the first that comes to mind. However, the program should account for these fees (or any parts beyond reasonable) in their numbers before deciding what % or pps amount to offer. |
FYI:
CCBill charges .39 cents Paycom/Epoch charges $2.00 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*** Like I said in my 1st post, I was thinking that the $2 fee that most places charge was a little high & I was going to start a thread on the topic sometime this week when I had some free time. But the email about the $5 fee I got this morning made me think that I should start the thread today. It was not meant as a personal attack on your company, just the straw that broke the camel's back. I do plan to call out some other sponsors on their fees when I get a chance, because I have a really hard time believing that it costs a company $2/check (let alone $5) |
Quote:
|huh Posting someones traffic total & their conv. ratio is the same as posting how much money they make. Just the ratios would have been sufficient to prove Mr. Yum was lying. But I can't tell if he was because GreenGuy edited the post and didn't leave just the ratios. So there is no way for me to know. So what was his ratio during these recent months? Was it bad or good? |
Quote:
So even if it took that emplyee 2 days to complete the task, you only at $0.80/check. |
duh- how did I block that line out?
$200 to stuff envelopes for a day- sounds like one of those jobs offered in the back of tabloids :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Had a lengthy chat with Mr Yum, something that we both could have benefited from prior to posting.
Fact is, we both made some mistakes. I agree, that posting his $$ was out of line and frankly out of character for me. I feel a little backed into a corner on this $5 check thing and reading his post really set me off. In his defense, he's no liar, he had some terrible months back in July/Aug last year. But in my defense, the last several months have been MUCH better. I can discuss the merits and downsides of checks endlessly but lets face it, I'm not locking any one's money up. I am providing options and listening to suggestions. So far everyone seems caught up in the amount, not the principle. How else do you get people off checks? They are not a good way to deliver funds. They are constantly lost or stolen, washed and illegally re-deposited for tens of thousands, misplaced, etc. . . . With epass (even though it initially costs more for me to send) it saves a lot of problems in the back end. That is why I offered (at my cost) to create an epass account for ANYONE who needs one. |
Quote:
|
Not to toot my own horn, but i can't resist.
Sexbankroll doesn't charge a check processing fee! :) R |
Quote:
Why not cut checks for a reasonable fee ($1) and then charge $5 or $10 for replacement checks? |
Quote:
For any part I played in jacking this thread from its intent, my apologies. We all know numbers fluctuate with programs and some affiliates do better than others...it's the nature of this business. I really didn't mean for my post to denigrate the program or kick in Mayors program protection mode. As to the checks issue, I still think $5 is exhorbidant...that's my perception. I understand your goal is to get people off checks, but the reality is a lot of folks still prefer checks...myself included. For one thing, it makes revenue tracking on my end easier. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I had a Google AdSense check that got lost in the mail. When I notified them, they put stop payment on the check and credited the amount back to my account. It got included with payout at the end of the next pay period. |
Quote:
|
Stop Payment fees are way more than $10.00, (maybe 3x that) and even if the sponsor issues another check or adds it to your next check, he still has to stop payment on the original, otherwise it could show up later and get cashed and he would get fucked.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc