View Single Post
Old 2005-08-09, 01:12 AM   #3
furrygirl
No offence Apu, but when they were handing out religions you must have been out taking a whizz
 
furrygirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham2
So what doyou see as the alternative. give a models ID to anyone who asks for it?

This is the problem with verifying the content is legal. On one hand safety of the affiliates on the other the safety of the model and the future of the business.

Fewer models will work if they see their IDs going to 1,000s of affiliates.
Thank you!

Believe it or not, models can be quite intelligent folk who do network with each other on things like this. I look forward to the day that models start suing sites for giving away their personal information alongside free content. If the "be-a good-person" responsibility of safeguarding a model's personal information isn't enough of a motivator for some, then maybe the risk of civil suits and losing money will be.

For a gallery submitter, the 2257 scare means paperwork hassles. For a model, it could mean her safety or even her life. I'm not being melodramatic: models are stalked and harassed, online and in person, and it only gets more dangerous when you have sites so shit-scared of jail time that they will risk a model's life to avoid losing affiliates. That, unfortunately, is the very definition of the "evil money-grubbing pornographer" stereotype that so many of us try to break free of. And the way I see it, this is the exact kind of panicky-ass behavior that the 2257 laws were meant to inspire in us.
furrygirl is offline   Reply With Quote