Quote:
Originally Posted by LB
Having used Nats as an affiliate and a program owner I absolutely love nats. I have also had the opportunity to run nats (using mostly epoch and vxsbill) and ccbill side to side as an affiliate and every time the nats solution gave me significantly better ratios. Also never had an issue as an affiliate since if I don't like how a sponsor implemented nats and don't like their setup, then I don't use them. Same goes for mpa and the others.
Must just be a case of preference, because unlike many of you I cant stand using ccbill as an affiliate. Its clumsy, slow, and I know sales aren't being tracked well.
|
So I assume that TitanBucks doesn't use CCBill as one of their processors...
I can log into any program which uses NATS right now, pull up the stats for this period and click on the last number shown under
Unq, which is Total, and recieve an incomplete list of referring URLs. Why is that? Right this moment at
TitanBucks, my total of Uniques this period is (woohoo) 13. When I click on
13, I get this:
http://fhg.planetpreggo.com/pp/pregnant-models-x... 2 0 0:2
http://fhg.planetpreggo.com/pp/pregnant-models-x... 1 0 0:1
http://fhg.planetpreggo.com/pp/pregnant-slut-fuc... 1 0 0:1
http://fhg.planetpreggo.com/pp/pregnant-models-x... 1 0 0:1
http://www.whoringwives.com/tgp/pantyhose/ 1 0 0:1
Total 6
Where are the rest, LB? If NATS is so damn good - where are the rest?
And why not display the number of visits to the tour AND to the join page? Is it because NATS allows you to set the cookie expiration so short, that by the time a surfer hits the join page, the cookie is dead and that affiliate tracking has ended?
I can't defend the pregnant yak-like speed of CCBill's affiliate admin, but I never heard anyone say that they don't trust their ability to track joins.