|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
#1 |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
quick question for US based webmasters
Ok lots of renewed talk about 2257 and inspection lately. So I have a question for web masters who make their living as affiliates;
if a program you were making money with had girls that looked questionable would you; stop promoting them check to make sure they had a clear 2257 statement and page request documents for the girls you were using to promote them with or a combination of the above I'd be very interested in hearing your responses and for a very good reason. spaz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Oh no, I'm sweating like Roger Ebert
|
I obviously promote alot of jaYMan Cash stuff. I know I am covered there in terms of 2257.
I have yet to come across a sponsor who is handing out docs. Then again, I have only asked for them from one sponsor. That request was last summer, and it was denied. So I just used their fhg's instead. (this was not a case of me doubting the ages, just trying to get compliant) If I really, really doubted the age, I would not promote them unless I was provided the docs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
0100011101100101011001010 1101011001000000100001101 1010000110100101100011
|
Quote:
If you check the threads of various boards during the period of panic a while back, you will find several who announced that they are willing to put a model's privacy and safety in jeopardy in order to keep their profits rolling in. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
Quote:
spaz |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
I'm a firm believer in not making myself a target. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|