Free Site for review

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by JustRobert

This brings up a question I have been meaning to ask.

Most LL's state no freehost and it is even in mine as well but when I think freehost I think of kinghost, pornparks,etc.

What do you and the other larger LL owners feel about a sponsors free host? Is this no different than free hosted site that most list? Or should this not be allowed as well?

I received a submission like this and was not sure if I should list it. After a couple days half the other LL's listed it so I went ahead and did so as well, since it was a good looking site, but I want to make sure I am on the same page as the rest of you.

Sponsor hosted sites are considered by most as free-hosting. What's the problem with that, sponsors go bust all the time. So there goes your hosting.

What if the sponsor isn't doing to well and decides to add a banner filled frame above every site it hosts?

The thing is, you should control your own content, and with ANY kind of free hosting there is the possibility that someone else has access to it.

And to your last point, you should list what YOU feel is comfortable and not worry about others list. I'm sure during my whois checking I've missed a freehost or two that I didn't recognize as being one. Other linklist owners may have done the same, or maybe they just don't care about it enough to deny a site.