Are These New Piece Of Shit Options Now Standard In NATS?

[DangerDave]

Shunga,

I am sorry.. but you are unlikely to find a "program owner" that dislikes NATS.. just as you have said.. it's great for you!

The problem is that the experience is not so great for the affiliate..

Eg: I had just started promoting your program.. and then you changed to NATS.

Now I have three NATS accounts with you and get three newsletters etc etc... but the fact is I stopped promoting you as soon as you changed.


---------------------------------------------------------
Another Example of Post NATS changes - Unamed CCBill Program

Pre NATS - 85000 - 68 - 1:1200
Post NATS - 20000 - 5 - 1:4700(and getting worse by the day)
----------------------------------------------------------


John, despite what you might see as negative views in regards to NATS, I think this episode/thread might just offer you a unique opportunity.

As Linkster has said, there are many webmasters here that promote 100s of programs/sponsors and have done so for many years. If you sought the advice of these webmasters on the functionality and workings of the affiliate side of NATS I think you could make some great improvements.

1. As GG said.. the "random" type code at the end of links is a huge pain is the ass
2. For me.. The timeout, and the multiple clicking just to recieve one link code is hugely annoying.
3. I am sure other "working" webmasters can give you some imput on possible improvements.


DD