Surpsied no one posted about 2257 2day

SirMoby · 2005-08-03, 09:17 AM

Looking at Sapphicerotica.com it's obvious to me that many of those models were in their 20s when shot but I know the models, I have the IDs and I know when they started. We're in the business and it's easy for us to tell these things but from a stiff suit that sits in an office all day it would be hard to tell.

Personally I think it's a great site to use as an example. It's owned over seas. The content was shot over seas. The models are mostly in thier 20s and many have appearded in hardcore videos for major producers.

Even a small look into this site would show that the new regulations would have NO effect on this perfectly legal site.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2005-08-03, 09:17 AM	#13
SirMoby Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer. Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 2,706	Looking at Sapphicerotica.com it's obvious to me that many of those models were in their 20s when shot but I know the models, I have the IDs and I know when they started. We're in the business and it's easy for us to tell these things but from a stiff suit that sits in an office all day it would be hard to tell. Personally I think it's a great site to use as an example. It's owned over seas. The content was shot over seas. The models are mostly in thier 20s and many have appearded in hardcore videos for major producers. Even a small look into this site would show that the new regulations would have NO effect on this perfectly legal site.