Double Standards?

[Loganp8000]

Originally Posted by Chop Smith

Since a link list stands a chance of earning a buck from listing a hosted free sites, should the rules for getting listed be different as compared to those from submitters?
I am not picking on the folks quoted above but using their words to show a possible trend developing - one that needs to be stopped early on. If not, link list owners can expect from sponsors providing hfs' over-templated sites filled with blind links, etc.

I tell you, it certainly has me VERY confused! GG signed up for my program, but I had no idea if I should get the recip links and place them in the front page, or create all the links with GG affiliate ID in place in the galleries. When looking at all the other freesites listed, some had recips on the front page, some didn't. Many sites had the same "blind links" I was accused of having. Isn't a blind link a thumb or text link that tricks the surfer and goes somewhere else? I had a thumb with no link on it at all, and a text link under it that goes to our site. Is that a blind link? Anyway, I really want to learn how to submit and create freesites for everyones LL, but its starting to become a math or science project at this point. I am patient. Thanks for pointing this out CHOP! ALOHA

[MrYum]

I agree that they should meet the standards as well

Though I don't think they always have in the past.

Yep Logan...the free sites game has gotten more complicated in the past few years. Largely this is due to the amount of absolute crap that gets submitted...or the outright cheats that have come out of the woodwork.

The good news is that someone that has some smarts, can string together a coherent sentence (can ya tell that's one of my pet peevs? )...and is willing to work hard, certainly can make some coin in free sites. Especially with a resource like this site...there's a vast amount of knowledge in these forums...and a lot of folks happy to share that knowledge/experience