I need a site critiqued

[Dollpix]

Shitty boards is most likely the reason. Back in the "day"
there were a lot of them!

My problem is, I think, all I have ever made before are
TGP galleries. I don't think the LL's rules are bad at all.

I just got confused when I was told to view sites that had
been listed.... I swear some of these webmasters change
their sites after they are listed...
I wish I had never looked at any of them. Never again!

Blind links to me, are different than they are today. But,
I'm getting it figured out, I think.

[Star Man]

Originally Posted by Dollpix

My problem is, I think, all I have ever made before are
TGP galleries. I don't think the LL's rules are bad at all.

Yeah,it's really basic stuff.Once you built 3 or 4 sites you'll be following the rules without even trying.

Originally Posted by Dollpix

I just got confused when I was told to view sites that had
been listed.... I swear some of these webmasters change
their sites after they are listed...
I wish I had never looked at any of them. Never again!

I think I'm a little confused myself on that one.

Originally Posted by Dollpix

Blind links to me, are different than they are today. But,
I'm getting it figured out, I think.

Just be sure to accurately and honestly describe your links and let the surfer know exactly where he/she is going to go if they click it.
For example,say you want to link to pornsitex.com...

These are blind links:
click here now
get more porn here
enter for more
watch full movie inside

These would be acceptible:
get more inside pornsitex.com.click here
click here to preview pornsitex.com
take the free tour of pornsitex.com

Hope that clears things up a bit.

[Dollpix]

I have seen warning pages with hardcore banners.

Isn't that a no-no? Doesn't the law frown quite deeply on that?

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Dollpix

I have seen warning pages with hardcore banners.

Isn't that a no-no? Doesn't the law frown quite deeply on that?

Some link lists prohibit hardcore on warning pages, most don't. There's no law involved, being that a warning page isn't any different from any other page on the net.

We should probably put the word warning in quotes because a free site's index doesn't really serve as much of a warning. Really, it's a page of ads which leads to the main page, which is yet another page of ads. I know, I know - you're going to say something about them both being full page ads after all, and my response is going to be, "yes and no." For all intents and purposes, the galleries are also FPAs, but with some titty pics thrown in to keep it interesting.

[Greenguy]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

...We should probably put the word warning in quotes because a free site's index doesn't really serve as much of a warning...

I was thinking about that in the shower today...right after I finished thinking of you

I really & honestly do wish that people used LEGIT warning pages.

[Useless]

Originally Posted by Greenie

I really & honestly do wish that people used LEGIT warning pages.

What fun would a warning page be if there wasn't a double anal creampie Flash movie on auto-play above the fold?

[Kisa]

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior

What fun would a warning page be if there wasn't a double anal creampie Flash movie on auto-play above the fold?

This made me laugh out loud! thank you!

[Dollpix]

Well, back when Max Cash got into a world of trouble....
The law definitely said, No hardcore allowed on any warning page
and every domain, sub-domain, etc. must have one.
A warning page is meant to send away under age surfers.
(Not that it does, but it covers our butts!)

But I see where U.W. is coming from. What we use for our free sites
isn't actually a warning page for our domain.
But... then again, it does get traffic.....

I think I'll just stick with a clean warning page for my free sites.