RE: Description, Description, Description

Murderous · 2005-02-05, 02:50 AM

See there. I do agree with all of you. That it is in deed good to have longer descriptions when possible. And like Kristian said, It is hard to be short, to the point AND original all at the same time.

The problem I have ie that LL owners are quick to whine about what a submitter does, even if he means no harm. Cheating? fine. bitch. ban. whatever. Watermarked content?decline. etc. etc.

Joe LL. Owner has a LL that accepts 40 characters... Jane LL. Owner sees this and wants to one up Joe, so she allows 50. Well Jerry the fucking dingleberry says he wants 100 and it pisses him off when he sees people doing what Joe and Jane said to do... this my friend poses a problem with me and the way we view our peers in the adult industry. And personally, I think a LL owner should think a bit different. The submitter is your friend, not fellow LL owners, they are your competition.

In case you all haven't noticed, but there is about a dozen or even a dozen... dozens... of threads started everyday by a guy (or gal) that has decided it was easier to run a TGP or a LL. The number of sites sharing this same business model has multiplied tremendously in the past 2 years since I started in the biz (going on 3 years). every dozen threads like that is a dozen surfers per link and a dozen honest bleeding, sweating, crying, submitter you will be losing tomorrow.

I think there should be NO limit, but then tables in many sites would suffer the dreads of wrapping.. or worse, non-wrapping. If the limit was the same on every site, there will always be that one that is different. But no reason to make submitters feel like there is yet one more obsticle that they have to overcome before they can get a seat in the back of this theatre, just so we can watch some other asshole take the stage.

Murderous

(PS - Hi Kristian, I have seen Romie only on ICQ in the past say2 maybe 3 months... I am still in, just hiding in the shadows where I can come out and kick up dust when I feel that something wrong has been said. Even if it were meant as an innocent piece of advice. Perhaps we catch up later on.)

Murderous · 2005-02-05, 02:58 AM

Heh... just thought of something. Grenguy and Jim are prolly sitting back reading this, shaking their heads, saying "glad to see you back Murderous... and you haven't changed a bit"

I have been this way since I entered the adult industries front door.

I believe that the ammount of traffic you have does not determine the size of your dick.

We ALL have something valuable to learn, and to teach as well.

Murderous

Greenguy · 2005-02-07, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Murderous

Heh... just thought of something. Grenguy and Jim are prolly sitting back reading this, shaking their heads, saying "glad to see you back Murderous... and you haven't changed a bit"

Actualy, Jim & I were partying all weekend & today is our 1st day "back" to the board

Mr. Blue · 2005-02-05, 03:03 AM

Only a few things I find annoying with the description length...here they are:

1. When the tgp sets the description length between two numbers fairly close. i.e. minimum 25 - Maximum 30. That's just annoying.

2. They say be descriptive but 20 character max. and they count the white spaces, lol. If you have any gallery that's even remotely unusual there's a snowball's chance in hell of fitting a good description in there.

3. Posting late at night when you're tired and the description, "Busty babe bangs big..." and suddenly you can't think of that one more b word that would fit to finish off your alliteration. However, this is my own personal cross to bear....hmm...bear...bear...hmm...nah.

2005-02-05, 02:50 AM	#1
Murderous I'm going to the backseat of my car with the woman I love, and I won't be back for TEN MINUTES Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: PennsWoods Posts: 85	See there. I do agree with all of you. That it is in deed good to have longer descriptions when possible. And like Kristian said, It is hard to be short, to the point AND original all at the same time. The problem I have ie that LL owners are quick to whine about what a submitter does, even if he means no harm. Cheating? fine. bitch. ban. whatever. Watermarked content?decline. etc. etc. Joe LL. Owner has a LL that accepts 40 characters... Jane LL. Owner sees this and wants to one up Joe, so she allows 50. Well Jerry the fucking dingleberry says he wants 100 and it pisses him off when he sees people doing what Joe and Jane said to do... this my friend poses a problem with me and the way we view our peers in the adult industry. And personally, I think a LL owner should think a bit different. The submitter is your friend, not fellow LL owners, they are your competition. In case you all haven't noticed, but there is about a dozen or even a dozen... dozens... of threads started everyday by a guy (or gal) that has decided it was easier to run a TGP or a LL. The number of sites sharing this same business model has multiplied tremendously in the past 2 years since I started in the biz (going on 3 years). every dozen threads like that is a dozen surfers per link and a dozen honest bleeding, sweating, crying, submitter you will be losing tomorrow. I think there should be NO limit, but then tables in many sites would suffer the dreads of wrapping.. or worse, non-wrapping. If the limit was the same on every site, there will always be that one that is different. But no reason to make submitters feel like there is yet one more obsticle that they have to overcome before they can get a seat in the back of this theatre, just so we can watch some other asshole take the stage. Murderous (PS - Hi Kristian, I have seen Romie only on ICQ in the past say2 maybe 3 months... I am still in, just hiding in the shadows where I can come out and kick up dust when I feel that something wrong has been said. Even if it were meant as an innocent piece of advice. Perhaps we catch up later on.)

2005-02-05, 02:58 AM	#2
Murderous I'm going to the backseat of my car with the woman I love, and I won't be back for TEN MINUTES Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: PennsWoods Posts: 85	Heh... just thought of something. Grenguy and Jim are prolly sitting back reading this, shaking their heads, saying "glad to see you back Murderous... and you haven't changed a bit" I have been this way since I entered the adult industries front door. I believe that the ammount of traffic you have does not determine the size of your dick. We ALL have something valuable to learn, and to teach as well. Murderous

2005-02-05, 03:03 AM	#4
Mr. Blue Searching for Jimmy Hoffa Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Long Island, NY Posts: 771	Only a few things I find annoying with the description length...here they are: 1. When the tgp sets the description length between two numbers fairly close. i.e. minimum 25 - Maximum 30. That's just annoying. 2. They say be descriptive but 20 character max. and they count the white spaces, lol. If you have any gallery that's even remotely unusual there's a snowball's chance in hell of fitting a good description in there. 3. Posting late at night when you're tired and the description, "Busty babe bangs big..." and suddenly you can't think of that one more b word that would fit to finish off your alliteration. However, this is my own personal cross to bear....hmm...bear...bear...hmm...nah.